Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Government, and had criticized the Govt. for wrong policy decisions. 13 The petitioner addressed a public meetings in all districts of Tamil Nadu, therefore, cases

respective life assured had taken the policy, viz., Jeevan Saral and after proper underwriting, the policy was issued to the life assured based ... that the maturity sum assured had been wrongly mentioned in the policy document. The petitioners, therefore, addressed representations to the respondents, more particularly mentioning

address of the 1st respondent, wrong pin code number was mentioned in the letter issued by the insurance company for cancellation of the policy

address of the 1st respondent, wrong pin code number was mentioned in the letter issued by the insurance company for cancellation of the policy

wrong, it could be addressed by the appellate authority. It had also been stated that initiation of disciplinary proceedings were violative of the policy

J.Alex Ponseelan vs The Director General Of Police on 27 February, 2014 Author: R

Sunitha Venkatram vs Ms.Divya Rayapati on 30 March, 2015 Author: S. Manikumar Bench: S

S.Ramamirtham vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 1 April, 2005 Author: M.Karpagavinayagam

A.Lazar vs M.K.Azhagiri on 29 September, 2011 Equivalent citations: AIR 2012 (NOC

enabling provision and not a mandate, and that petitioner had addressed to wrong quarters for relief. It is on being aggrieved with this approach made ... below the cut-off marks, she was not selected. As per the policy of the Government, 18% seats have been reserved