Officer Nic vs Mohamed Haji Latif on 20 December, 2013
Officer Nic vs Mohamed Haji Latif on 20 December, 2013
IN THE COURT OF SH
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 6568 (1.84 seconds)Aarif(Dar) vs Saieem(348/17Slc) on 2 June, 2025
Aarif(Dar) vs Saieem(348/17Slc) on 2 June, 2025
IN THE COURT OF MS
Aafrin(Dar) vs Saieem(348/17Slc) on 2 June, 2025
Aafrin(Dar) vs Saieem(348/17Slc) on 2 June, 2025
IN THE COURT OF MS
Shamia(Dar) vs Saieem(348/17Slc) on 2 June, 2025
Shamia(Dar) vs Saieem(348/17Slc) on 2 June, 2025
IN THE COURT OF MS
Anju Devi (Dar) vs Saieem (348/17 Slc) on 2 June, 2025
Anju Devi (Dar) vs Saieem (348/17 Slc) on 2 June, 2025
IN THE COURT
State vs Devender Sharma on 7 October, 2024
inducement of the bank officials
followed by deception and delivery of policy amounts. It is also not in
doubt that the forged documents were used ... briefly address the submission on behalf of the
accused persons that no wrongful loss was caused to the policy holders.
In the present matter
Smt. Jagmohini Dilawar Singh vs M/S Kotak Mohindra Prime Limited on 4 January, 2023
point of time for they were
deliberately sent at wrong addresses.
(x) That the arbitrator did not give applicant / petitioner
opportunity of being heard ... that all the notices were
deliberately sent at the wrong address and an ex-parte arbitral
award dated 27.02.2019 was passed against applicant / petitioner,
despite
Cbi vs . G.C.Gupta & Ors. on 16 October, 2014
Rajpal Yadav. He contended that Munish Yadav never applied
for any insurance policy, nor he has signed any claim form or
have collected the cheque ... Defence Counsel had
further contended that signatures of Munish Yadav were
wrongly and fraudulently obtained by the Investigating Officer
during investigations
Mohd Tahseem vs State Gnct Of Delhi on 18 February, 2026
Mohd Tahseem vs State Gnct Of Delhi on 18 February, 2026
IN THE COURT OF
M/S Chaudhary Motor Parivahan Sahkar ... vs Iffco on 29 August, 2024
impugned award
was against the fundamental policy of India as the Arbitrator had
given a wrongful interpretation to the limitation applicable to the
present case ... Respondent
40. Ld. counsel for respondent also filed written submissions and
addressed oral arguments. The main arguments of the respondent are
(i) petitioner