subsequent change of address was not
communicated to the respondent/DDA. It is submitted that the "Wrong
Address Policy," outlined in the respondent
subsequent change of address was not
communicated to the respondent/DDA. It is submitted that the "Wrong
Address Policy," outlined in the respondent
subsequent change of address was not
communicated to the respondent/DDA. It is submitted that the "Wrong
Address Policy," outlined in the respondent
subsequent change of address was not
communicated to the respondent/DDA. It is submitted that the "Wrong
Address Policy," outlined in the respondent
subsequent change of address was not
communicated to the respondent/DDA. It is submitted that the "Wrong
Address Policy," outlined in the respondent
subsequent change of address was not
communicated to the respondent/DDA. It is submitted that the "Wrong
Address Policy," outlined in the respondent
ordinary Premium. it was held that there was no material concealment and policy was not avoided.
26. The Present case however, presents no difficulty ... full address at which the lorry would be garaged, and inadvertently the wrong address was inserted. A claim was made under the policy when
drawn to the policy decision dated 20.12.2002 of the DDA in cases where allotment letter were sent to the wrong address. Paras ... said policy decision read as under:
2. At present the policy of DDA is to charge the old cost in cases of wrong address
Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson ... vs Competition Commission Of India And ... on 30 March, 2016
Author: Vibhu
matured but the intimation was sent at the wrong
address on the basis of the policy of the respondent.
8. The writ petition is contested ... wrong address and, therefore, the
petitioner has approached within a period of four years from the issue
of demand letter at the wrong address