actual address BE-40, Hari Nagar, Clock Tower, New Delhi-64, the case appears to be covered under wrong address policy dated 25.02.05 and proposed ... case of allotment of LIG flat to complainant under wrong address policy dated 25.02.05 and proposed consideration of the cost of allotment of LIG Flat
original policy, copy of which has been placed on record as Annexure R-1, makes it very clear that wrong address of the appellant ... wrong address i.e. H.No.63, without mentioning anything further. At that stage, it might have been sent at the wrong address
been stated that they want post loss endorsement for change in address of loss location. Hence, the letter dated 21.2.2014 is fake ... applicant to issue the policy with wrong location of the premises and residential address is written instead of his factory address. To rebut this, original
insurance policy. Insured-Late Smt. Ramawati concealed the
material fact regarding her ailments, gave proposal for new policy after
surrender of her previous policy. This ... wrong to
say that policy No. 066083703 was surrendered on the advice of answering
opposite parties, because proposal form for new policy was filled
different place. Vide letter dated 17.02.2014 an objection was raised about wrong address but was not attended. All the documents were pertaining to shed ... address was to their notice.
8. More so, it was not the first policy. From the perusal of Ex.C-1 the previous policy
indulging in any judicial homily but only echoing
the dynamic national policy on State litigation evolved at
a Conference of Law Ministers of India ... future
accusations of wrong decision making, or worse, of improper
motives for any decision making. Unless their insecurity and fear is
addressed, officers will continue
indulging in any judicial homily but only echoing
the dynamic national policy on State litigation evolved at
a Conference of Law Ministers of India ... future
accusations of wrong decision making, or worse, of improper
motives for any decision making. Unless their insecurity and fear is
addressed, officers will continue
2014 Page 8 of 10
policy, led evidence to bring about an impression that the insurance
policy which had been issued in respect ... note that the notice (Ex. R3W1/2) was not
even addressed to the second respondent (the appellant herein) who,
as per the pleadings
Legal Heris Of Decd.Umedmiya R Rathod & 5 vs State Of Gujarat on 4
decisions, or tendency to challenge all orders against them, is not
the policy of the Governments or statutory authorities, but is
attributable to some officers ... from
an instinctive tendency to protect themselves against any future
accusations of wrong decision making, or worse, of improper
motives for any decision making. Unless
