given after nine days.
Learned State Commission while allowing appeal, wrongly observed that affidavit of investigator was not filed whereas record reveals that Investigator, Advocate ... Pushpkumar Mundhra, filed affidavit before District Forum on 29.9.2007. Learned State Commission, further, wrongly observed that because there was no entry in favour of Gulab
from abdominal cancer before purchase of the policy and she had given wrong answers to questions no.11(e) and 11(i). Thus, there ... existing disease in the proposal form and gave wrong information in this regard. As per affidavit of Dr. O.P. Miglani, deceased remained admitted
commission could not appear on 16.10.2014 since a wrong date had been noted by him. The affidavit of the counsel has been filed along with
have issued
original of Ex. B16 report did not file his affidavit evidence in support of
the complainant that the OP doctor treated the complainant ... manner damaged the nerves of the complainant and that it was a
wrong treatment. Had the said medical
practitioner filed medical evidence there
appellant by tendering affidavits of her neighbors, that building was safe on 21/08/2012. Further, State Commission has wrongly observed that proposal form ... telephone number, on which the call was received. Her self-serving affidavit with regard to this fact cannot be said to be sufficient evidence, particularly
also submitted that the OP has given false statement in their counter
affidavit, which is reproduced as follows:
It is submitted that ... accordingly. All other allegations made by the appellant
against the same are wrong and incorrect.
6. The rival argument by the learned counsel
neither deliberate nor intentional but occurred in
the circumstances stated in the affidavit.
4.
Learned counsel has argued that the
period of limitation for filing ... name of the
petitioners advocate was wrongly recorded, the free copy was admittedly handed
over to wrong person and as such the question of knowledge
their tune and the company has not bothered even to produce his
affidavit with regard to his observation.
So, we rely the document Annexure ... engine of the car which stood repaired.
So, the claim was wrongly repudiated.
Thus,
we treat this complaint as genuine, accept the same and direct
which dashed against another cycle rider. Same fact has been mentioned in affidavit of Smt. Nagamma, complainant. Cyclist Umesh, who was injured has also given ... driving motor cycle at the time of accident. Learned District forum wrongly observed that deceased M. Mallu was pillion rider on the motor cycle
affidavit of Dr. S.P. Krishna, the then Managing Director in support of the complaint whereas the opposite party No.1 has filed affidavit ... contended that the consumer complaint has been filed on the allegation of wrongful release of the amount in favour of opposite party No.2 against
