Government Advocate as the affidavit was
prepared as a common affidavit for all the accused and it was wrongly
mentioned about the custody which would ... contention of the first respondent that the Government Advocate
drafted the affidavit wrongly would amount to making a false statement again
before this Court
abundant
caution, a fresh affidavit has been executed on 11.09.2023 tendering an
apology for obtaining a wrongful attestation. We are wholly unconvinced
with the explanation ... affidavit dated November 5, 1993 to the effect that
whatever was stated in the earlier counter-affidavit dated
October 30, 1993 was factually wrong
Chennai. Due to inadvertence the place of execution of the affidavit is
wrongly mentioned as Chennai. Additional rejoinder also filed by the
______________
Page ... been filed. Having realised
that the jurat portion of the affidavit it has been wrongly mentioned that the
affidavit been sworn in Chennai
Chennai. Due to inadvertence the place of execution of the affidavit is
wrongly mentioned as Chennai. Additional rejoinder also filed by the
______________
Page ... been filed. Having realised
that the jurat portion of the affidavit it has been wrongly mentioned that the
affidavit been sworn in Chennai
child only but the
counsel on record, while preferring the counter affidavit wrongly stated that he is
Page ... instruction to pay
maintenance to the child is wrongly typed in the counter affidavit filed by his
counsel amounts to a stage-managed
respondent, the above
assetion by the applicant/plaintiff in the affidavit is factually wrong, as the reply letter dated 10-5-1997 would clearly disclose ... denied by the first defendant though it is wrongly stated by the plaintiff/applicant in the affidavit that the debt and liability were admitted
duly sworn affidavit, then such affidavit of the rival candidate shall also be disseminated along with the affidavit of the candidate concerned in the manner ... duly sworn affidavit, then such affidavit of the rival candidate shall also be disseminated along with the affidavit of the candidate concerned in the manner
When the
document is not disputed merely because the document-Ex.P2 wrongly
describes the document-Ex.P1, this Court is unable to countenance ... evidence brought on record by the
parties by way of affidavits. A wrong question posed,
leads to a wrong answer, which is a misdirection
When the
document is not disputed merely because the document-Ex.P2 wrongly
describes the document-Ex.P1, this Court is unable to countenance ... evidence brought on record by the
parties by way of affidavits. A wrong question posed,
leads to a wrong answer, which is a misdirection
criminal case are that the civil suits were filed with false affidavit giving wrong dates. The Apex Court has, on facts found the allegations regarding
