Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 4762 (5.76 seconds)

M/S. Sundaram Medical Foundation Dr. ... vs V. Thanikaivelan S/O. Dr. P. ... on 31 May, 2011

desired result. As the opposite parties, negligently commenced the wrong treatment, due to wrong diagnosis, they should be held responsible. Because of the immobilization ... desired result, as the opposite parties negligently commenced wrong treatment, due to wrong diagnosis, made by the 2nd opposite party, and his colleagues. Thus
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sunil Lala vs M/S Qurwell Hospital on 29 January, 2021

denied of any sort of negligence and wrong diagnosis on their part in the treatment of the patient. The fourth respondent / Insurance Company supported ... negligence in treating the patient or that there was any wrong diagnosis about the ailment suffered by the patient. Having held so, - 6- the District
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next