desired
result. As the opposite parties,
negligently commenced the wrong treatment, due to wrong diagnosis, they should
be held responsible. Because of the
immobilization ... desired result, as the opposite parties
negligently commenced wrong treatment, due to wrong diagnosis, made by the 2nd
opposite party, and his colleagues. Thus
opposite party Dr.Sunilkumar.K made a wrong diagnosis can be ascertained from Ext.X1 discharge summary dated:20.12.99 issued from Kasthurba Medical College ... wrong diagnosis and the said diagnosis was made negligently. Even if the case of 1st opposite party that the diagnosis of lymphoma was made
doing such act of
omission, he has committed a palpably wrong diagnosis which comes under the
category of medical negligence or carelessness.
It is also ... established legal position that
despite the knowledge of wrong diagnosis as is revealed from the opinion of Dr.Vipin Tyagi and Dr.Govil the respondent
Chopra, committed gross medical negligence by giving treatment for Dysphagia. The
wrong diagnosis as well as error in the line of treatment given ... this
Commission held that mere wrong diagnosis by OP No. 1 and wrongly burning part
of healthy atrium ventricular node which created block
should be
reimbursed, by the opposite party since because of the wrong diagnosis and
treatment given by the opposite party, amounting to medical negligence ... committed medical negligence by
giving wrong treatment. It is the further
case that due to the wrong diagnosis and treatment given by the opposite party
Hiren this time too. If the complainant wished to
allege wrong diagnosis, it was incumbent on him to specify in the complaint the
date ... such allegedly wrong diagnosis and also what according to him would
have been the correct diagnosis. The complaint did not do so. The complainant
also
appellant that all these complications were caused due
to improper and wrong diagnosis, treatment and attention by the OP doctor. The
OPs did not take ... medicine.
(iii) Expert
evidence
Learned counsel submitted that it would be wrong to
suggest that there is no expert evidence regarding the alleged negligence
which he possesses.
Failure to use due skill in diagnosis with the result that wrong
treatment is given would be negligence.
(v) In a complicated ... held guilty of medical negligence by the Apex Court for making wrong diagnosis
of the disease with which Anuradha was suffering and
for prescribing
treatment of his wife in the said hospital.
Ultimately on wrong diagnosis and treatment his wife was declared dead
on 31.10.2006 and her dead body
case of some ailment of no
consequence, although by a wrong diagnosis. In such a situation, it could be
stated that he was himself
