opposite party to pay compensation of Rs.1,00,000/-
for wrong diagnosis, Rs.20,000/- for expenses incurred in AIIMS, New Delhi ... deficiency in service on the part of the respondent
doctor. merely wrong diagnosis does not amounts to any
negligency or deficiency on the part
appellant argued that the opposite party No. 1 has also adopted
wrong diagnosis in the treatment of the complainant and in the case ... learned counsel.
15. The District Forum has considered the plea of wrong diagnosis
raised by the complainant, which as rightly been objected by the
learned
only taken from
areas which were normal. Therefore,
because of a wrong diagnosis, Appellant had to unnecessarily take ATT drugs
which were ... Hospital, Delhi have also not indicated any negligence, mistreatment
or wrong diagnosis on the part of the Respondents. In fact, the findings and interpretation
negligence. Needless to
say that much depends on the diagnosis. Such wrong diagnosis, therefore, indicates
deficiency in service for which
taken on that date and Dr. Hardas Singh also
opined that wrong treatment was given to the complainant. Thereafter, a
Consumer Complaint ... Their contention is that due to wrong diagnosis, wrong treatment, negligence
and by passing of the laid down procedure in such kind of injuries
been conducted on 4.6.08 itself. It
was further stated that the wrong diagnosis by the doctors led to wrong
treatment and further inordinate delay ... attending doctors. It was further denied that a wrong diagnosis
was made in the case.
10. As
regards the allegation that the patient
health condition was deteriorating day by day due to wrong
diagnosis, medication, callus and negligent approach, which resulted
into aggravation of disease/condition ... Committee of experts has not opined that
there was anything wrong in the diagnosis and treatment of Koch's
disease or that
same, but that does not prove that the earlier report was wrong. It is submitted that the subsequent papers
filed by the appellant should have ... where cancer of grade-III was diagnosed. It was held that wrong diagnosis was not to
be treated as error of judgment but it showed
also existed among medical men (vide page 2604 and 2605). It is wrong and bad law to say that simply because a mishap occurred ... facilities needed for major operation. It is the law that a wrong diagnosis is not necessarily a negligent diagnosis. Complainants appear to have a case
action to the
complainant to sue opponent No.2 for wrong diagnosis on the basis of ELISA
test. The complainant has admitted
that