with
law, on the ground that it was filed in the wrong
forum. Hence, the present suit. The suit amount ... plaintiff
has claimed the benefit of period spend in the wrong
forum, but no separate application under Section 14 of the
Limitation Act has been
been dismissed on
the ground that it was filed in the wrong forum. Hence, the present suit
with abovesaid prayer.
3. Defence of defendant ... ground that the suit has been filed in the
wrong forum.
(ii) The relevant para of order dated 24.01.2011 is as follows
High Court that the time spent in the wrong forum
would not be counted for limitation purposes. Thereafter also,
the appellant filed the appeal mentioning ... show that at every stage, the
appellant has been choosing the wrong forum. When the
demolition order was passed, the appeal was required
reason that the appellant
was bonafidely litigating at a wrong forum and this appeal
has admittedly been filed on 2.2.2008.
3. In this case ... Delhi that the
present appellant was bonafidely litigating before a wrong
forum vide C.M(Main) no.1379/07 and in view of the fact
appellant was pursuing
judicial remedy with bonafide intentions before a wrong forum.
RCT No. 30308/16 Jain Swetamber Property Trust v. Ruqiya Begum ... condonation of delay that
appellant had been prosecuting remedy before wrong forum, such
condonation application cannot be allowed.
5)Hiralal Sarman Prasad
appellant was pursuing
judicial remedy with bonafide intentions before a wrong forum.
RCT No. 30307/16 Jain Swetamber Property Trust v. Ibrani Begum ... condonation of delay that
appellant had been prosecuting remedy before wrong forum, such
condonation application cannot be allowed.
5)Hiralal Sarman Prasad
whether Section 14 of the Limitation Act applies to cases where
wrong forum is chosen by the party or will it also apply ... Limitation Act applies where a party chooses a wrong forum but
will not apply where a party choose a wrong remedy. In para
present appeal due to the filing of the appeal in a wrong forum
in the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi, where the Appellant ... delay that occurred in the filing of the present appeal in wrong forum namely in
the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi where
service which was dismissed as withdrawn on 10.11.2006.
He chose a wrong forum for the relief. So, he should not be
granted any relief ... present case, the
claimant was contesting legal battle before the wrong forum from
01.01.01 to 10.11.2006. It was the fault of claimant that he fought
which objected to the same and it
was in this background that wrong advice of the counsel in
filing the revision petition was not condoned ... Lawyer concerned who advised the respondent to choose the
said wrong forum, becomes futile and same is hereby rejected.
30. The next contention raised
