went to the accused and the accused treated him by administering
an injection. Subsequently, the said Nataraj got high fever. So he was taken ... alleged side effects suffered by him due to the wrong injection administered to
him by the petitioner/accused. The medicine, which is alleged to have
role of quack and he advised one injection to the deceased and when the applicant injected that injection to the deceased, he died. The learned ... denied categorically that the deceased died on account of administering the wrong injection to him but that is not the cause of death
that the allegation against the
petitioner is that he administered the wrong injection to the minor
daughter of the complainant and because of that injection
father of the informant died. It is alleged that he gave wrong injection and medicine which resulted in his death. Learned counsel for the applicant
MISC. No.97 of 2021 dt.24-09-2021
2/5
injection due to which his condition deteriorated and despite
him having been taken ... submitted that as per
the allegation, the petitioner had administered a wrong injection.
9. Learned counsel for the informant submitted that
because of some misconception
reply has gone further and
commented that if the injection is wrongly administered, then
there happens reaction in the entire body, when he should ... categorically alleged
that it was due to wrongly administered injection in his arm by
the opposite party/appellant.
12. In view of the foregoing discussion
such as removal of the wrong limb or the performance of an operation on the wrong patient or giving injection of a drug to which ... such as removal of the wrong limb or the performance of an operation on the wrong patient or giving injection of a drug to which
such sale of the alleged injections and he was indulged in
the black-marketing of the Remdesivir injection, which was highly
required for treatment ... applicant then passed away due to Covid-19 because the injection
was wrongfully seized by the police and could never be utilized for
the treatment
medical negligence to prove the nerve injury was due to wrong administration of injection. There was history of fall from stool. It was further submitted ... opposite party's negligence in pricking the injection needle at the wrong site inflicting damage to the nerve / nerves. In consequence of which
with reference
only to one month and not more which is wrong a reading of
the provision. The Commission applied 1.2.1 (m) which
refers ... committed an
error in penalizing the Respondents on a wrong premise that
the actual injection of power is required to show that the
Solar Plants