independent investigation agency should be deputed. OP no.2
neither alleged wrong shipment of cargo from Sri Lanka ... issue any such certificate. The rationale
for the issuance of the pre-shipment inspection certificate and the
circumstances in which such a certificate is mandatory
against Shealth Services Pvt. Ltd. the
agent/counter-part of defendant alleging wrongful delivery. By an order
dated 17.8.2007, the Singapore Court gave ... Shealth and not defendant.
20 In my view, defendant is totally wrong. First of all, the law or
KJ
::: Uploaded on - 08/08/2017 ::: Downloaded
other
objections was that two shipments were overdue at the time of
submission of credit limit application. The shipment dated ... payment of shipment dated 27.3.2009, for which the claim was
lodged with OP was realized on 7.4.2009, therefore, on the basis of
wrong and incorrect
said letter after 2 ½ years of the shipment in question, leads to the conclusion that wrong facts are being stated with the intention of getting
District Amritsar.
10. The mail dated 11.04.2005 of the Buyer was a wrongful refusal
by the Buyer, an approved debtor to accept delivery ... aware of the fact of recalling the
containers/consignments in pursuance of wrongful repudiation of the contract
by the buyer/approved debtor, as apprised vide
filed on behalf of defendant by submitting that
plaintiff company is the wrong doer in the present case and
because of the deficient ... transportation of the
consignment in question. It is wrong to suggest
that the air shipment in question was booked on
routine terms
never due.
The plaintiff also delayed the shipments and acted in a very unethical
manner by wrongly and illegally stuffing other items in the container ... also denied that in pursuance of
shipment JJ106 they submitted wrong duty drawback which caused
loss to the defendant to the tune
shipment/consignment which was to be
forwarded from Shenzhen, China to Delhi, India was 1980 KG's but when the
shipment reached ... framing allegations that the plaintiff company was providing wrong
information as the weight of the shipment in question to which the plaintiff
company supplied
material
are directly proportional to the volume of shipments handled. For
example - delivery of 5 shipments would entail trips to 5 different
destinations irrespective ... cover the shipment
and not to carry the shipment and its consumption would vary
based on the number of shipments to be packed. Hence
which
included the amounts towards wrongful deduction in
invoice value, interest loss and carry over cost for
delay in shipment at Kandla.
4.6 The events
