Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

However, several things happened such as delayed delivery, short supply and wrong shipment of the 4/17 http://www.judis

which representation, the petitioner had sought for re-export of the wrong shipment of goods, viz., Adult Toys, back to the supplier, as requested ... judis  W.P.No.15765 of 2024 goods wrongly shipped to the petitioner and for release of plastic bottles for lab. 2. Pursuant to purchase

said Khettendra Paul, stating that an inadvertent mistake of wrong shipment was made and accordingly, they sought for re-export of 552 http://www.judis

appears to be not convincing is that, the supplier had sent wrong shipment of 78 cartons, containing adult toys, for which, they had not placed ... export of the 78 cartons, which according to them has been wrongly shipped. In fact, an identical prayer was considered by this Court

Shipping Bill. In other words, the exporter has wrongly declared that the shipment is not under payment of IGST, http://www.judis ... shipping bill. IN other words, the exporter has wrongly declared that the shipment is no under payment of IGST, despite the fact that they have

Shipping Bill. In other words, the exporter has wrongly declared that the shipment is not under payment of IGST, despite the fact that they have ... shipping bill. IN other words, the exporter has wrongly declared that the shipment is no under payment of IGST, despite the fact that they have

received by us and, we are not responsible for late shipment or non-shipment of the goods, or part of the goods." The learned ... without referring to the date of shipment. Mr. Krishnaswamy Aiyar has contended before us that this construction is wrong; that the sentence must be read

buyer. The first shipment was made on 10.06.2017 and the payment due was on 09.07.2017. The second shipment was effected on 24.07.2017 without prior approval ... beyond the purview of the policy cover. The first shipment was declared in wrong term payment of 60 days instead of 30 days

mail on 28.12.2017 to the petitioner stating that the shipment intended for Bangkok customer has wrongly been dispatched to the petitioner and therefore, requested

K.Subramanian vs / Author: G.Jayachandran Bench: G.Jayachandran Crl.A.Nos.631, 632, 638