undertook to ensure that they would
in fact give shipment of the goods from the defendant nos. 6 to 8 as
per the contract entered ... party shall not be in any way effected for short
shipment, wrong merchandise, non-shipment and will be entitled for its
service charges
plaintiff
shipped electric coils to Lagos, Nigeria, however the shipment was
wrongly off loaded at Apapa Quaya, Nigeria instead of Lagos. The
possession of goods
time or copy of the Discharge Certificate. Thus,
the Tribunal has wrongly calculated the laytime; firstly, not to
fumigate edible goods, and then to claim ... stated that the Tribunal has wrongly interpreted sub-Clause
16 of the Terms of Shipment by relying upon the judgment of "General
Capinpin
accepted by Sh. S. K. Tandon dishonestly to cause wrongful gain to the parties and wrongful loss to the insurance company. Investigation has disclosed that ... accepted by S. K. Tandon dishonestly to cause wrongful gain to the parties and wrongful loss to the Insurance company. In other words
stipulated shipment period under Clause 4 of the Contract was
extended conditionally due to the failure of the respondent. It was
wrongly construed that while ... effect on
the shipment of the goods was intimated to the petitioner. It is submitted
that Tribunal has wrongly arrived at a finding that
Lost Shipments across all accounts
70% of shipments were Delayed in Delivery specially Heavy
Account
Almost 300 shipments Delhivery CS Changed Delivery address
wrong ... cannot be used as a le
3) Almost 300 shipments Delivery CS Changed Delivery address
wrong due to which we had to ship it again
Plaintiff himself even before the Defendant was entrusted
with the goods for shipment, though it is now falsely claimed by
the Plaintiff in the suit ... agent
of the Defendant in Italy and the goods were wrongly delivered
by the Defendant to GERMANO.
(iii) The Defendant has specifically pleaded
What are the losses which the plaintiff has suffered on account of wrongful delivery of its consignment by the defendants?
8. Whether in view ... acknowledged wrong delivery of goods and offered to settle the claim by paying @US$ 20 per kg. Declared weight of shipment being
parties that only one shipment of 9000 MT of urea was
sent and there was no other shipment, examination of this witness was
unnecessary ... told not to
deliver other shipment of urea due to refusal by the complainant to accept
the shipment of 9000 MT of urea
impugned notification does not lay down any conditions and it is wrong to read the conditions laid down by prior notification in the subsequent special ... learned Member was wrong in this regard : "THEdonor informed us in April, 1979 that they will go through the shipment. They have sent
