observed in the
Order-in-Original that the respondent, claiming wrong
shipment/supply, had also sought for clearance, which did
not arise, and thus vide ... found with the
declaration by the respondent.
• The fact of wrong shipment was communicated by
the respondent to the supplier on 02.12.2011, which
was accepted
which
their supplier appears to have accepted their mistake
in wrong shipment and in turn, had requested the
appellant to re-export the same back ... appellant as
to the acceptance by the foreign supplier on the wrong
shipment as well as taking back the goods in question
clearly shows
stipulated shipment period under Clause 4 of the Contract was
extended conditionally due to the failure of the respondent. It was
wrongly construed that while ... effect on
the shipment of the goods was intimated to the petitioner. It is submitted
that Tribunal has wrongly arrived at a finding that
Suit for
declaration that the detention of the shipment / cargo by the
Respondent No.2 is wrongful, illegal and/or bad in law and further ... jointly and / or severally be directed to
release the shipment / cargo of the Petitioner and complete all
necessary formalities for issuing the certificate / delivery order
while OP3
contends, as he is represented logistics and shipment agency yet
has been wrongly impleaded to this complaint and denies all the
allegations made
submission of the learned counsel for the opposite parties
that the shipment sent by the complainant was delivered in the address given by the
complainant ... seal affixed therein, it could be understood
that the shipment was delivered to a wrong person viz. Venkatesh, and not to the office
of TANTRANSCO
policy, the complainant was required to submit the declaration of shipment made in a month by 15th of the next month and the declaration ... further stated in the written statement that the complainant has wrongly declared the shipments on DA-90 days terms whereas the same were actually made
Defendant has refuted the claim of recovery essentially on the
ground that shipment, qua which the invoices have been raised,
was as per the understanding ... Defendant that the Air Freight charges were wrongly put on the
Airway Bill, despite the Shipment being an FOB Shipment.
Subsequently, the Defendant, vide
defendant. It is wrong to suggest that the transportation charges
of Rs. 33,000/- have been wrongly charged by plaintiff from defendant as
mentioned ... dated 08.08.2011.
The rates of agency charges vary from shipment to shipment. It is
wrong to suggest that despite quoting the rates of agency charges
clients of Seagull for shipments to the accounts of Azure
International LLC. This apparently was being done by making wrong
representations to Seagull clients that
