import of
'Crystallised Glass Panel, but the overseas supper had wrongly
shipped different types of goods, the fact of which had also been
acknowledged ... also
noted the contentions of the importer-appellant that due to
wrong shipment, owing to detention of goods by the port
authorities, it had incurred
import of
'Crystallised Glass Panel, but the overseas supper had wrongly
shipped different types of goods, the fact of which had also been
acknowledged ... also
noted the contentions of the importer-appellant that due to
wrong shipment, owing to detention of goods by the port
authorities, it had incurred
February 2007 as you declared 'NIL' shipments whereas you declared shipments effected during these month on 07/01/2009. Therefore declaration ... times during the operation of this policy. Therefore by wrong declaration of the shipments and suppression of details of shipments effected as mentioned above
said shipment at Mumbai Port, it was revealed that the said shipment was unloaded at Durban Port by Carrier. Complainant requested several times to Respondent ... 004926 dated 07/01/2000 to Respondent No.2 for carrying this shipment from Durban to Mumbai. Respondent No.2 agreed to repay the said
storage
charges to BHEL and if it is not possible to make shipment to
Marib even after 06 months of the scheduled delivery, then ... breach
of contract. Petitioner has painstakingly argued that AT has gone completely
wrong in its approach while deciding the claim of damages and the favorable
subjected release of consignment on two
conditions :
(I. additional shipment business;
(ii. payment of Rs.20,00,000/- towards past dues
8 Plaintifs would assert ... thus, asserted that the
defendants cannot take disadvantage of their own
wrong and therefore are liable to release consignment
and pay demurrage charges.
9 Plaintifs
made from a godown in the
Village Mundka, Delhi, the DRI had wrongly alleged that the said
godown belonged to the present petitioner namely Paramjit ... respondent to even remotely suggest that the seized consignment
shipment bill No.9880760 dated 17.07.2012 in AWB No.618-2811901
dated 16.07.2017 allegedly seized
Arabic".
12. The learned Counsel, therefore, submitted that it is wrong
to conclude that subject goods were not Gum Arabic.
13. The learned Counsel ... were having knowledge or reason to believe about the
mis-classification and wrong availment of the exemption
notification.
14. It is further been submitted that
added), therefore, the assessee claiming the same as pass through
costs had wrongly reduced the same from its turnover and costs while computing
its margins ... were produced by the assessee, in the absence of any
evidence had wrongly been treated by the assessee as back to back costs
suit.
21. The plaintiffs claimed that the defendant
being the wrong doer is liable to pay the damages and
this allegation has been denied ... been stated that the defendant has
to insure all its valuable shipments at its own cost. It
further provides that in case of damage
