Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 242 (0.82 seconds)

R Amarnath vs M/O Finance on 28 June, 2024

pay was fixed/refixed under Rule 7 of CCS Pay Fixation Rule, 2008 at Rs. 77,900/- and arrears consequent upon such fixation of pay ... bunching of stages of pay in the pre 7th CPC scales consequent upon fixation of pay in the revised pay scales based
Central Administrative Tribunal - Madras Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

D J Baskar vs M/O Finance on 9 March, 2026

dismissed. The 5th Central Pay Commission had expressly rejected the demand for parity and upgradation of pay scales of Inspectors and Superintendents of the Revenue ... continuing cause of action is inapplicable, as no case of wrongful pay fixation or pension computation has been specifically pleaded. 18. In support
Central Administrative Tribunal - Madras Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Rosa Usha Antony vs M/O Finance on 9 March, 2026

dismissed. The 5th Central Pay Commission had expressly rejected the demand for parity and upgradation of pay scales of Inspectors and Superintendents of the Revenue ... continuing cause of action is inapplicable, as no case of wrongful pay fixation or pension computation has been specifically pleaded. 18. In support
Central Administrative Tribunal - Madras Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

A Muthukrishnan vs M/O Finance on 20 March, 2026

dismissed. The 5th Central Pay Commission had expressly rejected the demand for parity and upgradation of pay scales of Inspectors and Superintendents of the Revenue ... continuing cause of action is inapplicable, as no case of wrongful pay fixation or pension computation has been specifically pleaded. 18. In support
Central Administrative Tribunal - Madras Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Gerard Victor David vs M/O Finance on 20 March, 2026

dismissed. The 5th Central Pay Commission had expressly rejected the demand for parity and upgradation of pay scales of Inspectors and Superintendents of the Revenue ... continuing cause of action is inapplicable, as no case of wrongful pay fixation or pension computation has been specifically pleaded. 18. In support
Central Administrative Tribunal - Madras Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

K Kalaichelvi vs M/O Finance on 20 March, 2026

Central Pay Commission had expressly 16 OA 310/01247/2025 rejected the demand for parity and upgradation of pay scales of Inspectors and Superintendents ... continuing cause of action is inapplicable, as no case of wrongful pay fixation or pension computation has been specifically pleaded. 17 OA 310/01247/2025
Central Administrative Tribunal - Madras Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next