pay was
revised with effect from 22.09.2014. The Respondents have
furnished details about excess payment of pay scale on account of
wrong pay fixation ... wrong pay
fixation and consequent excess payment. The
undertaking is not about grant of higher pay on the
basis of right pay fixation
posts. He also submits that while there had been wrong fixation of pay of the
writ petitioners as far back as on 01.01.2006, the writ ... Pay Commission recommendation, which
was accepted vide the Central Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 2008.
However, another pay fixation was again done in the year
wrong pay fixation and
consequent excess payment. The undertaking is not
about grant of higher pay on the basis of right pay
fixation ... were wrongly
fixed in the pay of Rs.9300 - 34800 plus Grade pay of Rs.4200. The
Respondents subsequently noticed the wrong pay fixation
respect of an excess payment made to the petitioner because of wrong pay
fixation, the respondents have made recovery of Rs.1,57,604/- from ... head of
excess payment made to him because of wrong pay fixation done. He submits
that without there being any fault on the part
wrong fixation of pay in respect of the
respondent No. 1/petitioner was detected and they rectified the
fixation of pay under ROP 1990, thereby ... indicate that when the
revised pay scale/pay fixation was fixed on the basis
of the 5th Central Pay Scale, a condition was
superimposed which
purpose of
wrong fixation of pay, grant of grand pay, in fact the
respondents have conceded that wrong pay fixation was done on
account ... 3455 of 2012 dt. 16-04-2024
16/16
leading to wrong pay fixation/wrong grant of grade pay though
the respondent authorities are precluded
paid drawn. It is thus sought to be argued that wrong fixation of pay scale is a continuous wrong which accrues month to month basis ... contend that wrong fixation of pay scale is a continuous wrong.
9. Countering the submission of learned counsel for the original applicant, Shri
account of wrong pay
fixation, allowances + Rs.1,82,792/- towards other recovery).
4. Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 have contended that ... increments wrongly paid to him as on 01.04.2011 as
Page 12 of 13
WP6054-21
per the GR dated 27.02.2018 regarding wrong pay fixation. Therefore
account of wrong pay
fixation, allowances + Rs.1,82,792/- towards other recovery).
4. Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 have contended that ... increments wrongly paid to him as on 01.04.2011 as
Page 12 of 13
WP6054-21
per the GR dated 27.02.2018 regarding wrong pay fixation. Therefore
record that before or at the relevant point of time,
when wrong pay fixation was being made, no such indemnity bond or
undertaking was taken ... recovery of
excess payment made to the petitioner because of wrong pay fixation is
concerned, that indemnity bond is irrelevant.
Signature Not Verified
Signed
