been directed to be
recovered and petitioner was not responsible for wrong pay fixation. On the
aforesaid ground, counsel for petitioner prays for quashment ... petitioner and submitted that the excess
amount was paid due to wrong pay fixation and the excess amount was
recovered rightly from the gratuity
been
directed to be recovered and petitioner was not responsible for wrong pay
fixation. On the aforesaid ground, counsel for petitioner prays for quashment ... petitioner and submitted that the excess amount was paid
due to wrong pay fixation and the excess amount was recovered rightly from the
gratuity
been
directed to be recovered and petitioner was not responsible for wrong pay
fixation. On the aforesaid ground, counsel for petitioner prays for quashment ... petitioner and submitted that the excess amount was paid
due to wrong pay fixation and the excess amount was recovered rightly from the
gratuity
respondents
owe any statutory duty to maintain evidently wrongful pay fixation.
10. The Learned Advocate representing the respondents meticulously traced
the chronology from ... finally during the 6th CPC pay fixation in 2010.
15. Each time the petitioner was wrongfully upgraded, moving into grades, far
beyond the permissible levels
strength of
undertaking, recovery can not be affected."
11. Wrong pay fixation was carried out from 01.04.2006 & petitioner
had not furnished undertaking while ... corrected
within a short time of wrong payment but in the present case, the wrong pay
fixation has been carried out from
material fact or suppressed any material fact from respondents
and wrong pay fixation was carried ... respondents themselves and petitioner
is not liable to pay the alleged wrong pay fixation amount. To strengthen his
submission, learned counsel for petitioner placed reliance
Pay Scale Rules, 2009 in the Pay Scale 5200-20200/-
treating his basic pay as Rs.10,810/-+grade pay Rs.2400 ... tune of Rs.47,456/-, as an over payment due to
wrong pay fixation, wrongly done by the respondents, but no fault or fraud
from petitioner which was erroneously paid to
him on account of wrong pay fixation.
2
2. Learned counsel for petitioner would submit that petitioner ... ground that excess payment is made to him due to
wrong pay fixation. He submits that alleged excess amount of
salary has been paid
fixation
of the petitioner at Rs.13,860/-.
3. The grievance of the petitioner is that in view of the wrong
fixation of pay made ... excess salary paid to the petitioners, due to
a wrong fixation of pay made from 01.01.2006 by the
respondents, cannot be permitted.
5. The learned
whose rights and claim
for pay fixation is to be governed by HPCS
[Revised Pay] Rules and Three Tier Pay
Structure thereon ... party to wrong
pay-fixation; but the higher pay was granted
erroneously due to wrong interpretation of
Rules/Schemes by the State Authorities, then
