fails to disclose the necessary
ingredients to constitute the offence of wrongful restraint.
In order to attract application of Section 341 which
provides for punishment ... wrongful restraint, it 6 has to
be proved that there was obstruction by the accused; (ii)
such obstruction prevented a person from proceeding
certain offences but
convicted the appellant for the offence of wrongful restraint, threat and
damage to the public property. He further submitted that wrongful restraint ... relatives
of Narasimman and their evidence are contradictory. In this case, wrongful
restraint and abuse is made on the defacto complainant/Narasimman
Petitioner, as the Petitioner did not engage in any wrongful restraint
or obstruction of any individual.
(d) Section 4A(1a) of the Tamil Nadu Open ... involved in
obstructing public movement, thus, making him liable for wrongful
restraint under Section 341 of I.P.C.
(d) The provisions of Section
having heated arguments with the PWD officials would
not amount to wrongful restraint or deterring the public servant in
discharging their duty. The farmers ... Police and
other police personnel. Had there been any unlawful assembly, wrongful
restraint and use of criminal force or assault, it cannot happen
petitioners
have been primarily charged for forming unlawful assembly causing
wrongful restraint and nuisance to the general public. On information,
complaint had been lodged
petitioner has been
primarily charged for forming unlawful assembly causing wrongful restraint
and nuisance to the general public. On information complaint had been lodged
Indian Penal Code ( IPC ), which deal with unlawful assembly
( Section 143 ), wrongful restraint ( Section 341 ), and causing public
nuisance ( Sections
petitioner has been
primarily charged for forming unlawful assembly causing wrongful
restraint and nuisance to the general public. On information complaint ... untoward incident
happened, no public gave complaint stating that they were wrongfully
restrained. It is further submitted that prohibitory orders under Police Act
not published
some time that by itself does not constitute an offence of wrongful
restraint. He further relied upon the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme
have participated in the unlawful assembly or
engaged in any wrongful restraint, and no specific overt act is attributed
against