Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 121 (5.66 seconds)

Chirag Goyal vs M/O Defence on 25 February, 2026

commit offence under Section 341 & 323 as having contributed in wrongful restraint and also use of criminal force, thereby inflicting injuries ... committing offences under Section 341 & 323 by having contributed in wrongful restraint and also use of criminal force, thereby inflicting injuries on certain persons
Central Administrative Tribunal - Jaipur Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Deepak vs Home Affairs on 27 February, 2026

rioting, unlawful assembly, voluntarily causing hurt by a dangerous weapon, wrongful restraint, mischief causing damage, and criminal intimidation. The allegations specifically attributed to the applicant ... deadly weapon, unlawful assembly, voluntarily causing hurt by a dangerous weapon, wrongful restraint, mischief, and criminal intimidation--offences which could not be treated as trivial
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S. Ford India Pvt. Ltd. vs Yogesh Jain & Anr. on 2 April, 2026

technologically baseless. It is argued that airbag system operates as a Supplemental Restraint System (SRS) which is entirely distinct and separate from the seat belt ... without following mandatory provision of section 13 (1) (c) of the Act wrongly observed that allegations and evidence adduced by the complainant remained uncontroverted
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S. Ford India Pvt. Ltd. vs Yogesh Jain & Anr. on 2 April, 2026

technologically baseless. It is argued that airbag system operates as a Supplemental Restraint System (SRS) which is entirely distinct and separate from the seat belt ... without following mandatory provision of section 13 (1) (c) of the Act wrongly observed that allegations and evidence adduced by the complainant remained uncontroverted
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

A.B. Motors Pvt. Ltd. vs Yogesh Jain & Anr. on 2 April, 2026

technologically baseless. It is argued that airbag system operates as a Supplemental Restraint System (SRS) which is entirely distinct and separate from the seat belt ... without following mandatory provision of section 13 (1) (c) of the Act wrongly observed that allegations and evidence adduced by the complainant remained uncontroverted
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next