casual approach, negligence and lack of care towards the patient, gave wrong reports at both occasions, which resulted into serious consequences. On the basis ... further alleged that, due to wrong report, the patient did not go for MTP (medical termination of pregnancy) as per law under
when the agency is terminated, that it is wrong to tax the income
before the termination of the agreement.
* The decision of the Supreme Court ... needlessly prolonging the recognition of revenue
by recognizing it only at the termination of agency.
* Again, if a dealership is not terminated, no income
appointment makes
him unsuitable for appointment and liable for
removal/termination if he furnished wrong information when
the said information is specifically sought
whether
applicants were involved in the misappropriation or not.
Therefore, termination orders cannot be revoked till final
outcome of the investigation.
9. According ... have not committed any
misconduct and have been wrongly punished. The
respondents have passed the impugned termination orders,
7 OA No.665/2015
And connected
supra) was related to the case of
termination of service, which termination had been challenged as
being wrongful and illegal, and the Apex Court ... regard to reinstatement. The
instant case is not a case of termination of services of the
applicant, and it relates to re-employment after normal
Consequently medical termination of pregnancy was advised and carried out on 05.08.2001 by Dr. Asha Rawal. The opposite party had given a wrong report ... cannot be blamed for the consequences. It is wrong to allege that the alleged Medical Termination of Pregnancy had to be got done
adjudicating authority has confirmed the demand on management fees, penal interest and termination charges. The ld. Advocate submits that penal interest is in the nature ... similar to management fees, termination charges.
5.23 The ld. Advocate has further submitted that the ld.adjudicating authority has wrongly invoked the extended period
service or not makes inquiries
for this purpose, it would be wrong to hold that the inquiry,
which was held, was really intended ... behind his back,
it is held that the order of discharge or termination from service
is punitive in nature, even a bona fide attempt
society. He
was not prevented from taking up any assignment after
termination of agreement nor his registration with the Bar
Council was cancelled to practice ... assessee prayed that
the ld. CIT(A) has wrongly confirmed the action of the AO by treating
the amount of Rs. 35.00 lacs received
each, Rs.2,318.75 as interest at termination, Rs.27,044.67 as prepayment penalty, Rs.450/- as cheque bounced charges and Rs.107/- as overdue ... charges i.e. in all, Rs.52,790.42 was wrongly charged from him. Respondent/complainant had claimed an amount
