that requirement
also stood complied with and as such the order of termination is not liable
to be questioned at all.
35. There ... held that if erroneous promotion is
given by wrongly interpreting the rules, the employer cannot
be prevented from applying the rules rightly and in
correcting
S.Attakoya vs Union Of India on 30 June, 2016
Author: P. Gopinath
Bench: P
P.B. Venu Nath vs Union Of India Represented By on 22 August, 2016
Author
Abdul Rasheed.A vs Union Of India Represented By The ... on 21 July, 2016
Author
P. Venu vs The Union Of India on 20 July, 2016
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
ERNAKULAM
John (GL 112) and Smt.P.Devayani (GL 118) were wrong since, as
per the Tribunal order, no age limit needs be observed and hence ... cadre of Postman at Vadakara
Division and hence the proposed termination is not at all required. The
respondents filed reply
Jima Mohan vs Union Of India on 30 September, 2016
Author: P.Gopinath
Bench: P
