culled out from the aforementioned
judgments are:
i) In cases of wrongful termination of service, reinstatement with
continuity of service and backwages is the normal ... must always be kept in view that in the cases of
wrongful / illegal termination of service, the wrongdoer is the employer and
sufferer
culled out from the aforementioned
judgments are:
i) In cases of wrongful termination of service, reinstatement with
continuity of service and backwages is the normal ... must always be kept in view that in the cases of
wrongful / illegal termination of service, the wrongdoer is the employer and
sufferer
relief, in view of the fact that there was no wrongful termination as the workman/employee himself submitted resignation voluntarily and in such event ... question of wrongful termination did not arise at all. Therefore, according to the learned counsel for the petitioner/management, the appellate authority has misdirected himself
question, whether the relief of reinstatement in service pursuant
to any wrongful termination could be granted, has been considered in a catena
of decisions ... section 14 of
the Specific Relief Act, 1963. Even if the termination of the contract of
employment (by dismissal or otherwise) is found
question, whether the relief of reinstatement in service pursuant
to any wrongful termination could be granted, has been considered in a catena
of decision ... section 14 of
the Specific Relief Act, 1963. Even if the termination of the contract of
employment (by dismissal or otherwise) is found
open for the plaintiff to have sought for compensation for wrongful termination of the agency under Section 205 of the Contract Act. The present suit
culled out from the aforementioned
judgments are:
i) In cases of wrongful termination of service, reinstatement with
continuity of service and back wages ... must always be kept in view that in the cases of
wrongful / illegal termination of service, the wrongdoer is the employer and
sufferer
illegal and consequently the plaintiff has also sought damages for wrongful termination. The plaintiff by e-mail dated 05.08.2010 informed that he would return ... been further stated that the plaintiff has filed the suit for wrongful termination when he himself has sent notice to terminate the agreement
India, would be entitled to attendant benefits for the period between termination and reinstatement owing to Scrutiny Committee's findings being setting aside ... Charan Singh]. Charan Singh's case is one of wrongful termination.
35. Learned counsel for writ petitioner drew my attention to paragraph
India, would be entitled to attendant benefits for the period between termination and reinstatement owing to Scrutiny Committee's findings being setting aside ... Charan Singh]. Charan Singh's case is one of wrongful termination.
35. Learned counsel for writ petitioner drew my attention to paragraph
