disputes and differences between the parties arose on
account of termination of the contract and on account of blacklisting
of the JV. The JV filed ... interest and Rs.21,16,43,693/- towards damages for
wrongful and illegal termination of the contract. The JV also claimed
M3Nergy Sdn. Bhd. (Formerly Known As ... vs Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd ... on 3 November, 2025
M3Nergy Sdn. Bhd. vs Hindustan Petroleum Corporation And ... on 3 November, 2025
2025:BHC-OS
part of the respondents to make balance down payment
and that the termination of the agreements by the petitioner was accordingly illegal
and unlawful ... there were breaches on
the part of the petitioner and hence wrongful termination and accordingly allowed
the claims for compensation rightly
reason to interfere in the
findings recorded by the Tribunal about wrongful termination in
violation of provisions of Sections ... lump-sum compensation is
directed to be paid on account of wrongful termination of the
Respondents in August 2002, in my view, award of following
reason to interfere in the
findings recorded by the Tribunal about wrongful termination in
violation of provisions of Sections ... lump-sum compensation is
directed to be paid on account of wrongful termination of the
Respondents in August 2002, in my view, award of following
crores paid by the Petitioner.
6) According to the Petitioner, even after termination
letter dated 27 May 2015, MADC once again approached the
Petitioner with ... result. On 13 September 2024, Petitioner addressed notice to
MADC alleging wrongful termination of LOA and seeking refund
of the amount paid alongwith interest. Petitioner
2023 is itself
sufficient to establish that the respondents/employees had given wrong
information in their applications for employment submitted to the petitioner ... reason for the
petitioner's loss of confidence and their termination. On the aspect of
suppression of facts, the petitioner has placed reliance
reply from the
claimants as regards their responsibility thereof. Instead, the
claimants wrongfully claimed frustration of contract and repudiatory
breach of contract without any legal ... prevented the respondent to complete the transaction by wilful
breach and wrongful termination of MAPA and thus the respondent
Page 17 of 57
30th January
reply from the
claimants as regards their responsibility thereof. Instead, the
claimants wrongfully claimed frustration of contract and repudiatory
breach of contract without any legal ... prevented the respondent to complete the transaction by wilful
breach and wrongful termination of MAPA and thus the respondent
Page 17 of 57
30th January
