arise. Be that as it may, even if there was
wrongful termination of the contract on the part of the petitioners, the respondents
would ... unless the respondents
would have suffered loss in view of such wrongful termination and such loss
would have been proved by the respondents by leading
prayed for
recovery of the damages/compensation arising out of the wrongful termination of
leave and licence and amenities agreement during the lock in period ... which would
indicate that the respondent had accepted the validity of the termination of the
agreement effected by the petitioner is concerned, learned senior counsel
remedy of
the party would be to seek compensation for wrongful termination but not a claim
::: Downloaded on - 09/06/2013 ... remedy of the
appellants would be to seek compensation for wrongful termination but
not a claim for specific performance of the agreements and for that
claim for damages made by the
respondent on the ground of wrongful termination. The petitioner has
impugned the said majority award allowing the claim
Nirmal Infrastructure Private Limited vs Aanant Developers Private Limited on 26 November, 2015
Author: R
submits that Delhi High Court has
rendered prima facie finding that the termination of the agreement by
the respondent was unlawful, agreement stands reinstated ... finding of the learned Single Judge
on the issue of wrongful termination of the said 2015 SLA and the
modification of the same in terms
submits that Delhi High Court has
rendered prima facie finding that the termination of the agreement by
the respondent was unlawful, agreement stands reinstated ... finding of the learned Single Judge
on the issue of wrongful termination of the said 2015 SLA and the
modification of the same in terms
submits that Delhi High Court has
rendered prima facie finding that the termination of the agreement by
the respondent was unlawful, agreement stands reinstated ... finding of the learned Single Judge
on the issue of wrongful termination of the said 2015 SLA and the
modification of the same in terms
part of the respondents to make balance down payment
and that the termination of the agreements by the petitioner was accordingly illegal
and unlawful ... there were breaches on
the part of the petitioner and hence wrongful termination and accordingly allowed
the claims for compensation rightly
read with Clause 20.1
of the development agreement, no action for termination of development
agreements could be taken by the respondent ... remedy of the appellants would be to seek compensation for wrongful
termination but not a claim for specific performance of the agreements and for that
