applicant were terminated illegally and wrongfully. The
applicant approached before the concerned authorities against the wrongful
termination but when no action was taken, he along
claims that the
3
termination order is a non-speaking and cryptic order as no reason
disclosed while passing the termination order and also ... hearing to the applicant, has passed the termination order dated
29.08.2015. The applicant has challenged the impugned termination
order on the ground that the same
date of original order of
termination i.e. 24.03.2004 and remained in force till the final order of
termination dated 05.05.2006 passed by the Disciplinary ... under suspension during
the above period of fresh inquiry, he was wrongly denied the
subsistence allowance for such period.
15. Accordingly
above, whereunder an
innocuous order of termination on the ground of unsuitability can
be passed, has illegally and wrongly been invoked by the
Respondent ... punishment for the
misconduct of unauthorized absence invoking the wrong rule
which applies for termination on the ground of unsuitability. He
Page
following relief(s): -
(1) That impugned order of termination dated 26.10.2010 (Annexure No. 1 to the Compilation No. 1) be quashed and the applicant ... Agra (in the O.A. name of Shri P.K. Pandey has wrongly been mentioned as Shri R.K. Pandey). Subsequently, applicant was given temporary
right) Satish Chander Anand v. Union of India (1953 SCR 655) or termination by compulsory retirement in terms of specific rule ( Shyam Lal v. State ... been complied with, the termination of the service or the reduction in rank must be held to be wrongful and in violation of the constitutional
valuation. The petitioner cannot be found fault with, in the
preparation of wrong key answers. Courts of Karnataka, Delhi
and the Hon'ble Supreme ... observed in Vikas Pratap Singh 's case (cited supra), the
termination of such appointees would not only impinge upon
their economic security, but also
only a
termination simplicitor, therefore, Tribunal has erred in
law in holding that orders of termination are bad since
no opportunity was afforded to applicant ... appointments were
made wrongly or there were some illegality and
irregularities in their appointments and in such cases
an order of termination by Appointing Authority
only a
termination simplicitor, therefore, Tribunal has erred in
law in holding that orders of termination are bad since
no opportunity was afforded to applicant ... appointments were
made wrongly or there were some illegality and
irregularities in their appointments and in such cases
an order of termination by Appointing Authority
only a
termination simplicitor, therefore, Tribunal has erred in
law in holding that orders of termination are bad since
no opportunity was afforded to applicant ... appointments were
made wrongly or there were some illegality and
irregularities in their appointments and in such cases
an order of termination by Appointing Authority
