Sri. Waseem Mohammed vs State Of Karnataka on 21 November, 2024
testimony of PW.1. In
such circumstance, the learned Special Judge wrongly convicted
the accused exclusively relying on the surmises and conjectures
without duly considering
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 135 (1.10 seconds)Syed Vaseem vs State Of Karnataka on 14 June, 2022
further submission that
the learned Sessions Judge wrongly read the evidence and
wrongly convicted the appellant/accused. Hence he prays to
allow the appeal
G B Jagadeesh vs State Of Karnataka on 5 February, 2020
evidence brought on record and thereby committed
error in coming to wrong conclusion convicting the
appellant/accused which has resulted in gross failure of
justice ... Court without considering this aspect of the
matter has erred in wrongly convicting the accused for the
aforesaid offences.
13. Learned counsel for the appellant
Chandra @ Chandrashekara vs State Of Karnataka on 22 October, 2024
learned Sessions Judge totally misread the evidence of
witnesses and wrongly convicted accused No.2 in the crime.
Accordingly, he prays to set-aside ... learned Sessions
Judge misread the evidence of those witnesses and wrongly
convicted accused No.2. It is well settled position of law that
benefit
Mohana vs The State Of Karnataka on 22 October, 2024
learned Sessions Judge totally misread the evidence of
witnesses and wrongly convicted accused No.2 in the crime.
Accordingly, he prays to set-aside ... learned Sessions
Judge misread the evidence of those witnesses and wrongly
convicted accused No.2. It is well settled position of law that
benefit
K M Eshwara vs State Of Karnataka By on 4 November, 2024
must be and not merely may be guilty before a court can
convict and the mental distance between 'may be' and
'must ... doubt. The learned
Sessions Judge misread the evidence on record and wrongly
convicted the accused for the offences punishable under
Ningappa S/O Rachappa Kundargi vs State Of Karnataka on 8 November, 2017
punishable u/S 302 of IPC. But the
trial Court has wrongly convicted the accused for the offence
punishable
Venkatagirigowda @ Venkatagiri vs The State Of Karnataka on 8 June, 2018
while appreciating
the statements, evidence and documents on record and
has wrongly convicted the appellant by giving erroneous
finding, as none of the documents
Pujar Ramesh vs The State Of Karnataka on 6 March, 2017
Public Prosecutor for the State and the counsel for the accused
and convicted the accused and sentenced to undergo rigorous
imprisonment for life and also ... evidence to convict the
:5:
accused and the Trial Court has wrongly convicted the accused.
It is further pointed out that there are no eyewitnesses
T Narayanappa vs State on 14 January, 2020
could have effected the
wrongful transaction through PWs 5 and 6 disclosing
both of them of his fraud and wrong intent. This
circumstance casts ... conclusion of
convicting the accused. Hence, the learned counsel
contends that the Trial Court has erred in convicting
Accused No.1.
The further circumstance that