Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

testing has an unparalleled ability both to exonerate the wrongly convicted and to identify the guilty. It has the potential to significantly improve both

learned Public Prosecutor, as well as, the learned defence Counsel, has convicted the accused and sentenced him as mentioned above. 18. Feeling aggrieved from ... framed against him beyond any reasonable doubt. The learned trial Court has wrongly accepted the oral, as well as, documentary evidence of the prosecution

Trial Court, on misguided appreciation of facts and law, had wrongly convicted the appellants. 2) The evidence of P.W.1 is not only self ... facts and circumstances, by wrongly placing reliance on Ex.P.16 and rejecting Ex.D.1, had erred in convicting the appellant/accused

counsel for the accused/petitioners submitted that the court below seriously went wrong in relying on the uncorroborated solitary testimony of the victim which suffers ... failed to prove the guilt of the petitioners, the court below wrongly convicted them and therefore they are entitled to be released on bail

learned counsel for the appellant, such evidence was not enough to convict the said appellant. Apart from this, the learned counsel for the appellant submitted ... appellant claimed that the appellant (accused No.2) was wrongly convicted by the impugned judgment and order. 12. Mr. A.C. Jaltare, learned counsel appearing

learned counsel for the appellant, such evidence was not enough to convict the said appellant. Apart from this, the learned counsel for the appellant submitted ... appellant claimed that the appellant (accused No.2) was wrongly convicted by the impugned judgment and order. 12. Mr. A.C. Jaltare, learned counsel appearing

learned counsel for the appellant, such evidence was not enough to convict the said appellant. Apart from this, the learned counsel for the appellant submitted ... appellant claimed that the appellant (accused No.2) was wrongly convicted by the impugned judgment and order. 12. Mr. A.C. Jaltare, learned counsel appearing

learned counsel for the appellant, such evidence was not enough to convict the said appellant. Apart from this, the learned counsel for the appellant submitted ... appellant claimed that the appellant (accused No.2) was wrongly convicted by the impugned judgment and order. 12. Mr. A.C. Jaltare, learned counsel appearing

defence. 5. After conclusion of trial, the appellant was convicted and sentenced, as mentioned above. 6. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that ... medical examination of the prosecutrix, therefore, the trial Court has wrongly convicted the appellant. Learned counsel prays to allow the Appeal and set aside

their version and all being interested witnesses, the Courts below has wrongly convicted the petitioner. Further, the Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that