which is unsustainable in law and accused No.2 has
been wrongly convicted.
8. He further contended that the court below
has not properly appreciated ... date of alleged
incident but the trial Court has wrongly convicted the
accused No.2/appellant. He further submitted that the
accused
available, the trial Court has not properly considered
and appreciated and wrongly convicted the accused-
appellants herein. PW.10, the wife of the deceased Raju ... prove the guilt of the accused, the trial Court has
wrongly convicted the accused-appellants herein. He
further submitted that the medical records produced
before
material is available before the trial Court, the trial
Court has wrongly convicted accused No.3. He
further submitted that though PW.13, Head
Constable ... trial Court without proper
appreciation of the facts and law has wrongly
convicted the accused. Hence, he prayed to allow
the appeal by acquitting
come to the wrong conclusion by
holding that accused are the persons involved in the
said case and has wrongly convicted the accused. He
further ... learned Sessions Judge has accepted the said evidence
and has wrongly, convicted the accused. Though there
is no worth believable evidence produced before the
Court
arguments submitted that
the trial Court has wrongly read the evidence and wrongly convicted the
accused persons. He has submitted that as per the case ... material factual aspects involved in
the case, wrongly read the oral and documentary evidence and wrongly
convicted the appellant accused in all the three appeals
properly considered and
appreciated by the Court below and wrongly
convicted these appellants accused Nos.1, 2 and 5.
Hence, he submitted to allow
Trial Court, without considering all
these aspects of the matter, has wrongly convicted the
accused for the alleged offence under Sections ... learned Sessions Judge and the
learned Sessions Judge wrongly proceeded to convict
the accused persons. In view of the material placed on
record, both oral
oral and documentary evidence and have wrongly
5
held that the revision petitioner is guilty and wrongly convicted
him. He also submitted that the revision
properly appreciated by the Trial Court
and the accused has been wrongly convicted. Hence,
submitted to allow the appeal and to set-aside the
judgment ... these materials,
29
factual as well as the legal aspect and wrongly
convicted the accused, the judgment and order of
Trial Court is illegal
wrongly read the evidence and
has come to the conclusion that the appellant-accused has
demanded and accepted the bribe amount and has wrongly
convicted
