Prasad nor Nanhey Prasad (deceased persons) and learned court below has wrongly convicted him under Section 302 / 34 I.P.C., and he can only ... considering the evidence of the prosecution, therefore, the trial court has wrongly convicted the appellants on the basis of same evidence. As it is well
accidental in nature and the surviving appellant Dheer Singh has been wrongly convicted and punished under Section 302 IPC. The judgment is contrary ... courts have been compelled to accept that "society suffers by wrong convictions and it equally suffers by wrong acquittals". I find that this
been falsely implicated in this case by the informant and wrongly convicted by the trial court. No offence is made out against the appellant. Learned ... suicide-note. In this way, appellant is wrongly convicted by the trial court, therefore, the instant appeal may be allowed.
8. Learned AGA submitted that
converted under Section 304 IPC. Learned trial court convicted the appellant under Section 323 IPC and exonerated the appellants under Section 304 IPC. During trial ... grounds that the learned trial court, without appreciating true facts, wrongly convicted the appellant and presently conviction and sentences awarded to him is too severe
find out the truth. Unsolved crimes, unsuccessful prosecution, unpunished offenders and wrongful convictions brings our criminal justice system in disrepute thereby creating an impression
respondent in his statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. alleged that wrong testimony was tendered against him and he did not receive any Currency ... evident from the statements of the witnesses. The respondent was wrongly convicted by the leaned Munsif Magistrate, Unnao and that mistake has been corrected
other police personnel were captured by the accused party and were wrongfully confined near the Plani of Ramdeo Pandey wherefrom they were subsequently got released ... offence under Section 332 I.P.C. and he has been wrongly convicted and sentenced under Section 332 I.P.C. No doubt, Dhananajai Pandey
Pawan Kumar Pandey @ Bablu And Others vs State Of U.P. on 30 May, 2022
other hand, may come to the conclusion that the accused was wrongly convicted of the offence which forms the subject of appeal before the Sessions ... offence for which the trial Court could have convicted the appellant but had wrongly acquitted him. In so doing, the appellate Court will necessarily consider
Counsel for the appellants is that Sessions Judge had wrongly convicted the appellants with the aid of Section 149 I.P.C. There ... appellant Natthu is convicted under Section 302 I.P.C.
35. Now the question arises whether the appellant Natthu can be convicted under Section
