evidence against the applicant and trial court convicted him without any basis and wrongly. The applicant states that the Inquiry Officer and Court failed ... removal on the basis of conviction by the Criminal Court is wrong when the appeal against the conviction is pending. The employee cannot be removed
which a life convict escaped, has imposed a somewhat lesser punishment of removal from service on the respondent. The Tribunal was wrong in saying that
Territory of Chandigarh in view of the fact that he had furnished wrong information in the Attestation Form.
2. One of the relevant columns (Column ... required the furnishing of information about whether the applicant had ever been convicted or acquitted by Court of any offence. Against the former column
Rakhi vs Education Deptt., Ut Chandigarh on 6 May, 2019
Author: P. Gopinath
Bench: P
Unknown vs Union Of India Through The Secretary on 6 October, 2015
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Dr Sarbjit Singh vs Education Deptt., Ut Chandigarh on 6 May, 2019
Author: P. Gopinath
registered against the applicant
by one of the investor wherein he was convicted and sentenced to
undergo simple imprisonment for three years along with fine ... that there has been
no claim/payment with regard to the alleged wrong payment of
NSC/KVPs for the relevant period, therefore, the retaining
Lakhvir Singh vs Income Tax Department on 18 November, 2025
1
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
CHANDIGARH
Hardeep Singh vs Income Tax Department on 18 November, 2025
1
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
CHANDIGARH
Harminder Singh vs Income Tax Department on 18 November, 2025
1
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
CHANDIGARH
