levelled against the accused beyond
reasonable doubt and the trial Court wrongly convicted the accused for
the offences under Section ... offence under Sections 451 , 352 and 506(i) of IPC but
wrongly convicted the accused for the offence under Section 323 of IPC.
Infact
Court failed to appreciate the entire oral and
documentary evidence and wrongly convicted and sentenced the
appellant, which warrants interference of this Court ... appellant . The trial
Court also without considering the entire materials wrongly convicted
and sentenced the appellant for the offence under Section
doubtful.
Unfortunately, the trial Court failed to consider the entire facts wrongly
convicted the appellant.
7.3 The learned counsel for the appellant further submitted that ... stated in the final report ie. on 22.07.2018, the trial
Court wrongly convicted the appellant by stating that mere wrong
mentioning of date of occurrence
read with 34 IPC (Two counts). However,
the trial Court wrongly convicted the appellants for the offences
punishable under Section 324 read with ... prosecution had not identified the accused and the
appellants have been wrongly convicted.
8.2 The learned Counsels would further contend that though
failed to consider the inordinate delay in filing
the complaint and wrongly convicted the appellant.
8.The learned counsel appearing for the appellant would further ... intact. The trial Court failed
to consider the medical evidence and wrongly convicted the appellant.
The evidence of the mother of the victim girl
said fact was not considered by the Juvenile Justice Board and wrongly
convicted the revision petitioner and other accused as if they have
committed penetrative ... consider oral and
documentary evidence produced by the prosecution and wrongly convicted
on the ground of sympathy. The appellate court, as a fact finding court
above place and therefore, the learned Sessions Judge
wrongly convicted the appellant for the offence punishable under Section
6 of the POCSO Act by stating ... dates i.e., 13.01.2018,
14.01.2018 and 15.01.2018. The learned Sessions Judge wrongly
convicted the appellant without considering the fact that the period
between
Child Marriage Act, 2006 and acquitted him from the
said charge wrongly convicted and sentenced the appellant for the offence
under Section ... evidence. The trial Court failed to
appreciate the entire evidence and wrongly convicted the appellant only on
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Page
Trial
Court, on misguided appreciation of facts and law, had wrongly
convicted the appellants.
2) The evidence of P.W.1 is not only self ... facts and circumstances, by wrongly
placing reliance on Ex.P.16 and rejecting Ex.D.1, had erred in convicting
the appellant/accused
embellishments in the case of the prosecution, had wrongly found the
appellants guilty and convicted and sentenced them.
11. It is apposite to refer that ... tangible
contradictions thereon, has rendered an erroneous finding and has
wrongly convicted and sentenced the appellants and thereby, they
are entitled for acquittal
