part of the cartel. It is argued appellant No.1 was wrongly clubbed with
members of the Cartel without any application of mind ... never
supported by any document, hence was wrongly relied upon by the
Commission to convict this appellant.
6. Heard.
7. A bare perusal
other way. The order must cause him a legal
grievance by wrongfully depriving him of something. It
is no, doubt a legal grievance ... injure That the order is wrong or that
it acquits someone who he thinks ought to be convicted
does not by itself give rise
other way. The order must
cause him a legal grievance by wrongfully depriving him of
something. It is no doubt a legal grievance ... That the order is wrong or that it acquits some one
who he thinks ought to be convicted does not by itself give rise
other way. The order must
cause him a legal grievance by wrongfully depriving him of
something. It is no doubt a legal grievance ... That the order is wrong or that it acquits some one
who he thinks ought to be convicted does not by itself give rise
Myotic Trading Private Limited vs Deepak Maini Resolution Professional ... on 12 March, 2026
NATIONAL COMPANY
Myotic Trading Private Limited vs Deepak Maini Resolution Professional ... on 12 March, 2026
NATIONAL COMPANY
appellant guilty for perjury is two fold
(a) the appellants have given wrong information to the ROC in Form No.18
required for converting ... Counsel of the Appellants that the Ld. NCLT
has no power to convict the appellants under Section 68 of the IBC since such
conviction
appellant guilty for perjury is two fold
(a) the appellants have given wrong information to the ROC in Form No.18
required for converting ... Counsel of the Appellants that the Ld. NCLT
has no power to convict the appellants under Section 68 of the IBC since such
conviction
appellant guilty for perjury is two fold
(a) the appellants have given wrong information to the ROC in Form No.18
required for converting ... Counsel of the Appellants that the Ld. NCLT
has no power to convict the appellants under Section 68 of the IBC since such
conviction
appellant guilty for perjury is two fold
(a) the appellants have given wrong information to the ROC in Form No.18
required for converting ... Counsel of the Appellants that the Ld. NCLT
has no power to convict the appellants under Section 68 of the IBC since such
conviction
