currency notes from the present appellants were
doubtful and had been wrongly convicted by the learned Trial Court. At this
stage, it requires mention that ... this Court of
the considered opinion that the appellants have been wrongly convicted under
Section 489-B IPC. 489-B IPC provides for the punishment
police station including Satender accused.
After hearing arguments, the trial Court had convicted the
accused and sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for life ... proved on file. The trial Court ignoring all those facts has wrongly
convicted the accused.
First coming to the delay regarding reporting the matter
evidence in defence.
After hearing the arguments, learned trial Court convicted
and sentenced accused as mentioned above, which left them aggrieved
and they have filed ... offence
under Section 120-B IPC and as he was wrongly convicted and
sentenced by the trial Court for the said offence, his appeal deserves
Singh @ Bobby have been attributed specific injuries and they
have been wrongly convicted and sentenced in this case.
Learned State counsel has argued that injury
offence under Section 324 read with Section 34 IPC (though wrongly
convicted for the offence under Section 324 IPC).
In the result, the conviction
bring home the guilt, acquit the innocent, or
exonerate those wrongly convicted. Forensic DNA
Technology has revolutionized the modes of
investigation of violent crimes
Learned counsel for the appellant contended that the
learned trial Court has convicted the appellant without taking into
consideration the version of the defence ... appellant.
We are, therefore, conclude that the appellant was wrongly
convicted and sentenced for commission of offence punishable under
Section 302 IPC by the learned
appellant is entitled to be acquitted and the learned trial Court
wrongly convicted and sentenced him for the alleged commission of
offences punishable under Sections ... also contended that the school certificate Ex.PE was wrongly relied
upon for determining the date of birth of the prosecutrix, which
appellants beyond shadow of reasonable
doubt. The learned trial Court, thus, wrongly convicted and
sentenced the appellants vide impugned judgment of conviction and
Sunder Sham
incident. This evidence was wrongly relied upon by
the trial Court for convicting and sentencing the appellants as this
evidence could be accepted ... conviction and sentence upon the
appellants.
The learned trial Court, thus, wrongly convicted
and sentenced the appellants vide impugned judgment and order
of sentence that
