Bachan Singh, Sher Singh And Anr. And ... vs State Of Punjab And Ors. on 16 August, 1982
Bachan Singh, Sher Singh And Anr. And ... vs State Of Punjab And Ors. on 16
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 2636 (1.28 seconds)Union Of India And Another vs Tulsiram Patel And Others on 11 July, 1985
Union Of India And Another vs Tulsiram Patel And Others on 11 July, 1985
Equivalent
Bachan Singh Etc. Etc vs State Of Punjab Etc. Etc on 16 August, 1982
subsequently it is found that he was innocent and was
wrongly convicted, he can be set free. Of course, the
imprisonment that he has suffered ... innocent. But that is not possible where a person has been
wrongly convicted and sentenced to death and put out of
existence in pursuance
Krishna Mochi & Ors vs State Of Bihar on 15 April, 2002
Singh (PW 19) though claimed that he identified this
appellant but he wrongly identified one Bihari Manjhi as this appellant. Thus, the
evidence of this ... courts have been compelled to accept that "society
suffers by wrong convictions and it equally suffers by wrong acquittals". I find
this Court
Mukesh & Anr vs State For Nct Of Delhi & Ors on 5 May, 2017
Mukesh & Anr vs State For Nct Of Delhi & Ors on 5 May, 2017
Virendra Singh vs State Of M.P on 9 August, 2010
record to satisfy ourselves whether the appellant Virendra
Singh has been wrongly convicted under section 302 read
with section 34 IPC?
16. According
Pulicherla Nagaraju @ Nagaraja Reddy vs State Of A.P on 18 August, 2006
convicted A-3 under section 302 IPC
and sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for life and pay a fine of
Rs.1,000/-. It convicted ... caution, so that neither the
guilty escape nor the innocent wrongly convicted. If on such careful
scrutiny, the evidence is found to be reliable
Kalu Ahir And Others vs Ramdeo Ram on 1 May, 1973
escapes on the plea of enmity
nor an innocent person gets wrongly convicted on that basis.
[131G-H]
JUDGMENT:
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Criminal Appeal ... that neither the guilty party wrongly escapes on the plea
of enmity, nor an innocent person gets wrongly convicted on
that basis.
In this case
Suman Sood @ Kamal Jeet Kaur vs State Of Rajasthan on 14 May, 2007
evidence as to conspiracy and both the Courts were
wrong in convicting the appellants for the offences with
which he was charged.
14. On behalf ... punishable under Section 364A / 120B , IPC, the High
Court was clearly wrong in convicting her under Section
364A read with Section 120B
Ishwar Chand Jain vs High Court Of Punjab & Haryana And ... on 26 May, 1988
appellant
acquitted the accused for the offence under Section 366 IPC
but convicted him under Section 363 IPC and released him on
one year ... evidence on the record. The
trial court seems to have wrongly convicted the
appellant."
The appellant made representation against the aforesaid
remarks