complaint is doubtful. And
thus the Trial court has wrongly convicted the
appellants.
10
o The Trial Court ought to have taken into
account that ... created and concocted one. And thus the Trial
Court has wrongly convicted the appellants.
o The Trial Court has filed to appreciate the fact
that
appellants has argued that the learned
Additional Session Judge has wrongly convicted the appellants when
the prosecution has failed to establish the charges beyond reasonable ... under section 34
of I.P.C. therefore, they have been wrongly convicted u/s 302 and 307
I.P.C. with
Prasad nor Nanhey Prasad (deceased persons) and learned court below has wrongly convicted him under Section 302 / 34 I.P.C., and he can only ... considering the evidence of the prosecution, therefore, the trial court has wrongly convicted the appellants on the basis of same evidence. As it is well
which is unsustainable in law and accused No.2 has
been wrongly convicted.
8. He further contended that the court below
has not properly appreciated ... date of alleged
incident but the trial Court has wrongly convicted the
accused No.2/appellant. He further submitted that the
accused
evidence, the learned ASJ
has discharged the Jeevan and Nilesh but wrongly convicted the
appellant. Once the appellant has been acquitted for the offence
under ... Kumbhi) which is an open place. Therefore, the appellant has
wrongly convicted only on the basis of the dying declaration. In
the case
evidence which has been
highlighted by the accused by wrongly convicting the
accused; that though there is no evidence to substantiate the
offence under Section ... learned
Sessions Judge has wrongly convicted the accused. He
further contended that in order to attract the provisions of
Section 3 of the Act, there
worthy to believe,
:7:
the Trial Court has wrongly relied upon such evidence
and has wrongly convicted the accused. On these
grounds, he prayed ... without proper appreciation of the evidence,
has come to the wrong conclusion and wrongly
convicted the accused. The judgment of conviction and
order of sentence
with both. The trial
Court without looking into these aspects has
wrongly convicted the appellants-accused for 10
years. They further submitted that, already ... guilt of the
accused. The trial Court without any evidence
has wrongly convicted. The conviction as
against accused No.4 is liable
material is available before the trial Court, the trial
Court has wrongly convicted accused No.3. He
further submitted that though PW.13, Head
Constable ... trial Court without proper
appreciation of the facts and law has wrongly
convicted the accused. Hence, he prayed to allow
the appeal by acquitting
with both. The trial
Court without looking into these aspects has
wrongly convicted the appellants-accused for 10
years. They further submitted that, already ... guilt of the
accused. The trial Court without any evidence
has wrongly convicted. The conviction as
against accused No.4 is liable
