without looking into the said provision has
committed serious error and wrongly convicted the
accused for the offences punishable under Section ... without there being any
jurisdiction have entertained charge sheet and has
wrongly convicted for the offence under Section
2018. The trial Court without appreciating the evidence
properly, wrongly convicted the appellant for the aforesaid offences.
C
There are several omissions and contradictions
Courts below have
placed reliance on the same and have
wrongly convicted the applicants.
(i) That Both the Courts below failed to
appreciate the aspect ... accepted in his cross
examination that he was convicted in other
case for giving wrong opinion about
handwriting. Therefore, report of this
handwriting expert cannot
MMDR Act . Without considering the said aspect, the trial
Court has wrongly convicted the accused-appellants
under the provisions of MMDR ... material on record, , has come to a wrong conclusion and
has wrongly convicted the accused. On these grounds,
he prayed to allow the appeal
Lower Appellate Court have failed to
consider the these aspects and wrongly convicted the petitioner/A-4.
23. In view of the same, this Court
itself and
therefore, there was no wrongful loss caused to the defacto complainant.
However, the trial Court wrongfully convicted the revision petitioner for the
offences ... said Paulsamy and the Investigating Officer, the trial Court has wrongly
convicted the revision petitioner/accused No.1. He also pointed out that
there
revision petitioner
vehemently contended that both the courts have
wrongly convicted the accused by not appreciating the
material evidence on record. He further contended that
documentary, on record, convicted and sentenced the accused for
various offences, aggrieved by which the petitioners have preferred
appeals before the II Additional Sessions Judge ... trial Court. However, the trial Court
and the lower appellate Court wrongly convicted the accused which
are liable to be interfered with
documentary, on record, convicted and sentenced the accused for
various offences, aggrieved by which the petitioners have preferred
appeals before the II Additional Sessions Judge ... trial Court. However, the trial Court
and the lower appellate Court wrongly convicted the accused which
are liable to be interfered with
appellant
pending the appeal.
T h e appellant has been convicted for commission of offence under
Section ... Learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that appellant has been
wrongly convicted by the trial Court as it has not appreciated the evidence
