appellants has argued that the learned
Additional Session Judge has wrongly convicted the appellants when
the prosecution has failed to establish the charges beyond reasonable ... under section 34
of I.P.C. therefore, they have been wrongly convicted u/s 302 and 307
I.P.C. with
Prasad nor Nanhey Prasad (deceased persons) and learned court below has wrongly convicted him under Section 302 / 34 I.P.C., and he can only ... considering the evidence of the prosecution, therefore, the trial court has wrongly convicted the appellants on the basis of same evidence. As it is well
working as Assistant Soil Conservative Inspector.
5. The trial court convicted Umesh Chandra Rai-A6 under Section 302
read with Sections ... learned counsel for the appellant submitted
that the High Court has wrongly convicted the appellant. He submitted that
the conviction cannot be based only
would be held liable for his
individual act. Learned Trial Court wrongly convicted the appellants
on the basis of surmises and conjectures. Hence, the impugned ... related to the deceased. Hence, the trial Court wrongly relied
on their testimony to convict the appellants. We are not
inclined to accept this contention
alleged eye-witnesses against these
appellants is unreliable. Trial court has wrongly convicted the
appellants while learned counsel appearing on behalf of
3
appellants Krishnakant
present case we further find that Mahmood, who was
convicted on appeal against acquittal has since served out
his sentence and is no longer ... attracted.
We, however, do not accept the contention that Mahmood was
wrongly convicted and S. 148 I.P.C. is not attracted.
Finally the counsel
evidence, the learned trial court and the
appellate court acted illegally in convicting
and sentencing the revision petitioners and
thus, the same cannot be legally ... 2003
..39..
appellate court erroneously appreciated the
evidence on record and wrongly convicted the
accused for the offences punishable under
Sections
enmity factor does not cause either the innocent to be wrongly convicted or guilty to be wrongly acquitted. It is the duty of the Court ... just and safe to rely on the testimony of eye witnesses to convict the accused-appellants Gauri Shanker Singh, Narain Pal Singh, Raj Pati Singh
convict respondent Harinderpal Singh and others under Sections
307 / 506 / 148 / 149 of the IPC, however, the said respondents have been only
convicted under Sections ... submitted that the appellants have been wrongly convicted
and sentenced. The appellant Harinderpal Singh is 55 years old. He was
selected as a Municipal Counselor
other three accused. There was an appeal by
three convicted persons to the High Court
convicted the appellant alone under Section 302
of the Indian ... Section 302 / 34 , that is to say the
other accused were wrongly convicted by the trial
court in that way but the appellant should have
