appellants has argued that the learned
Additional Session Judge has wrongly convicted the appellants when
the prosecution has failed to establish the charges beyond reasonable ... under section 34
of I.P.C. therefore, they have been wrongly convicted u/s 302 and 307
I.P.C. with
Part-II, IPC but the learned trial court went wrong in convicting the appellant Naina Ram of offence under Section 24 , Cattle Trespass ... went wrong in convicting appellants Moola Ram. and Naina Ram for offence under Section 323 IPC. He further went wrong in convicting Smt. Roopi under
said witnesses the trial Court has come to a wrong
conclusion and has wrongly convicted the
accused. The Police have already visited the place ... accepted the said version
but has come to a wrong conclusion and has
wrongly convicted the accused. Hence, he prayed
to allow the appeal
said witnesses the trial Court has come to a wrong
conclusion and has wrongly convicted the
accused. The Police have already visited the place ... accepted the said version
but has come to a wrong conclusion and has
wrongly convicted the accused. Hence, he prayed
to allow the appeal
Prasad nor Nanhey Prasad (deceased persons) and learned court below has wrongly convicted him under Section 302 / 34 I.P.C., and he can only ... considering the evidence of the prosecution, therefore, the trial court has wrongly convicted the appellants on the basis of same evidence. As it is well
similarly circumstances. Hence,
appellant- Harkishan was also wrongly convicted of
offence under Section 302 of IPC. Instead of that
offence he should have been convicted
place of occurrence and the learned trial
Court has wrongly convicted them by holding that they also inflicted
injury to the deceased and were member
Section 149 IPC
could not be taken and the appellants were wrongly convicted under the said
provision. In nutshell, his submission was fourfold
working as Assistant Soil Conservative Inspector.
5. The trial court convicted Umesh Chandra Rai-A6 under Section 302
read with Sections ... learned counsel for the appellant submitted
that the High Court has wrongly convicted the appellant. He submitted that
the conviction cannot be based only
under Sections 148 , 324 / 149 ,
323 / 149 , then how can they be convicted under Section 307 IPC with
the aid of Section ... 2000 have been
wrongly convicted under Section 307 IPC with the aid of Section 149
IPC, and therefore, their conviction cannot be sustained. Accordingly
Criminal
