appellant
has submitted that the appellant had wrongly been involved in the
offence and convicted, though there is no sufficient evidence on
record, to involve ... appellant, has submitted that the appellant (A-31) has been wrongly
convicted for the offences under TADA and the Arms Act . The
confessional statements
Kadri (AA) and Jamir Sayyed Ismail Kadri (A-133) (dead
after being convicted by the Special Judge) was a party to conspiracy ... disposal of the said articles in the creek. The Special Judge has
wrongly given the benefit of doubt to him. Thus, the appeal deserves
Yakub Abdul Razak Memon vs State Of Maharashtra Th:Cbi Mumbai on 21 March, 2013
State Of Maharashtra vs Kamal Ahmed Mohd. Vakil Ansari & Ors on 14 March, 2013
Hazara Singh vs Raj Kumar & Ors on 18 April, 2013
Equivalent citations: (2013) 2
Lal Bahadur & Ors vs State(Nct Of Delhi) on 8 April, 2013
Equivalent citations
Resurgence India vs Election Commission Of India & Anr on 13 September, 2013
Equivalent citations
Sushil Sharma vs State (Nct) Of Delhi on 8 October, 2013
Author: Chief Justice
Bench
Hema vs State Tr.Insp.Of Police Madras on 7 January, 2013
Equivalent citations: AIR
Rakesh & Anr vs State Of Haryana on 22 March, 2013
Equivalent citations: AIRONLINE 2013
