sentence moved on behalf of the appellant-
Ramprasad.
The appellant has been convicted and sentenced by First
Additional Sessions Judge, Rajgarh vide judgment dated ... trial Court has not properly appreciated
the evidence on record and wrongly convicted the appellant for the
72
aforesaid offence. There are fair chances
without looking into the said provision has
committed serious error and wrongly convicted the
accused for the offences punishable under Section ... without there being any
jurisdiction have entertained charge sheet and has
wrongly convicted for the offence under Section
under Sections 148 , 324 / 149 ,
323 / 149 , then how can they be convicted under Section 307 IPC with
the aid of Section ... 2000 have been
wrongly convicted under Section 307 IPC with the aid of Section 149
IPC, and therefore, their conviction cannot be sustained. Accordingly
Criminal
police station including Satender accused.
After hearing arguments, the trial Court had convicted the
accused and sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for life ... proved on file. The trial Court ignoring all those facts has wrongly
convicted the accused.
First coming to the delay regarding reporting the matter
this aspect of the matter in its right perspective and wrongly
convicted accused Birbal for the commission of the offence
.
punishable under Section ... rather has denied all the
incriminating circumstances appearing against him either being
wrong or for want of knowledge. The accused, in such
circumstances acted smart
recorded by a Judicial Officer. The trial court has
completely went wrong."
3(g)(c) DNA profiling, as discussed above in Paras ... testing has an unparalleled ability both to exonerate the
wrongly convicted and to identify the guilty. It has the potential
to significantly improve both
whereby the appellant/accused/convict (hereinafter
referred to as 'the accused') has been convicted and sentenced to undergo
rigorous imprisonment for ten years ... premise that the learned Trial
Court wrongly convicted and sentenced the accused/convict, under Section
304 of the Indian Penal Code instead of Section
evidence and
the legal position, it appears that trial Court has wrongly convicted
the appellant. Prosecution did not discharge their duties to prove the
case
appellant submits
that the judgment passed by the learned Sessions Judge,
Rajahmundry convicting the appellants for the offence under
Sections ... whose evidence was
untrustworthy, the Sessions Court wrongly convicted the accused.
12. The learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State while
submitting his reply arguments
same has not been done so the accued-appellant has been wrongly convicted.
In this regard, he has placed reliance on the judgment given ... that has been made (or even if you know it to be wrong), recognize that the rules of evidence are the best rules that
