complaint is doubtful. And
thus the Trial court has wrongly convicted the
appellants.
10
o The Trial Court ought to have taken into
account that ... created and concocted one. And thus the Trial
Court has wrongly convicted the appellants.
o The Trial Court has filed to appreciate the fact
that
before the concerned trial
Court, the present petitioner accused has been
wrongly convicted by the concerned trial Court and,
therefore, the petitioner is having ... petitioner on merits by contending
that the concerned trial Court has wrongly convicted
the present petitioner. In support of the said
contention, learned advocate
appellants has argued that the learned
Additional Session Judge has wrongly convicted the appellants when
the prosecution has failed to establish the charges beyond reasonable ... under section 34
of I.P.C. therefore, they have been wrongly convicted u/s 302 and 307
I.P.C. with
Court failed to appreciate the entire oral and
documentary evidence and wrongly convicted and sentenced the
appellant, which warrants interference of this Court ... appellant . The trial
Court also without considering the entire materials wrongly convicted
and sentenced the appellant for the offence under Section
into an error by
considering the prosecutrix as minor and has wrongly convicted
the appellant/convict by virtue of impugned judgment and order;
(iv) that ... into an error by considering the prosecutrix as minor and has
wrongly convicted the appellant/convict by virtue of impugned
judgment and order. Reliance
doubtful.
Unfortunately, the trial Court failed to consider the entire facts wrongly
convicted the appellant.
7.3 The learned counsel for the appellant further submitted that ... stated in the final report ie. on 22.07.2018, the trial
Court wrongly convicted the appellant by stating that mere wrong
mentioning of date of occurrence
take the
evidence of PW-9, Psychiatrist into consideration while
convicting the Appellants under Sections 306 and 498A of
IPC.
7. The conviction ... prosecution, we
are of the view that Trial Court wrongly convicted the Appellants and the
High Court was also not justified in upholding the conviction
testing has an unparalleled ability both to exonerate
the wrongly convicted and to identify the guilty. It has the
potential to significantly improve both
post-
conviction claim to access evidence, at the behest of the
convict, who wished to prove his innocence, through new
DNA techniques. It was observed ... tissues when such
evidence is at issue. DNA testing has exonerated wrongly
convicted people, and has confirmed the convictions of
many others.”
143. Several decisions
Shailendra Govil.
4
(6) The Trial Court, after evaluating the prosecution
evidenc, convicted and sentenced the appellants for the
offence, as mentioned in para ... further contended that the Trial Court has wrongly
convicted appellant accused Man Singh u/S 302 read with
Section 34 of IPC although
