appellants has argued that the learned
Additional Session Judge has wrongly convicted the appellants when
the prosecution has failed to establish the charges beyond reasonable ... under section 34
of I.P.C. therefore, they have been wrongly convicted u/s 302 and 307
I.P.C. with
Part-II, IPC but the learned trial court went wrong in convicting the appellant Naina Ram of offence under Section 24 , Cattle Trespass ... went wrong in convicting appellants Moola Ram. and Naina Ram for offence under Section 323 IPC. He further went wrong in convicting Smt. Roopi under
said witnesses the trial Court has come to a wrong
conclusion and has wrongly convicted the
accused. The Police have already visited the place ... accepted the said version
but has come to a wrong conclusion and has
wrongly convicted the accused. Hence, he prayed
to allow the appeal
Prasad nor Nanhey Prasad (deceased persons) and learned court below has wrongly convicted him under Section 302 / 34 I.P.C., and he can only ... considering the evidence of the prosecution, therefore, the trial court has wrongly convicted the appellants on the basis of same evidence. As it is well
said witnesses the trial Court has come to a wrong
conclusion and has wrongly convicted the
accused. The Police have already visited the place ... accepted the said version
but has come to a wrong conclusion and has
wrongly convicted the accused. Hence, he prayed
to allow the appeal
sufficient material regarding unlawful assembly the trial
:6:
Court has wrongly convicted the accused. Fundamental
requirement is existence of unlawful assembly as defined
under Section ... established. Though, there is no sufficient evidence
the trial court has wrongly convicted the accused persons for
the alleged offences. It is his further submission
been made out against these appellants and they have been wrongly convicted and; sentenced for this offence. The learned Public Prosecutor, on the other hand ... made out, and they have been wrongly convicted and sentenced by the learned trial Court. The learned trial Court, while convicting these two accused-appellants
Trial Court did not appreciate
the said facts and wrongly convicted the appellant. It is averred
that the Ld. Trial Court convicted the appellant without ... facts and
circumstances involved in the present case and wrongly
convicted the appellant without considering and failing to
appreciate that even if the allegations
assembly as per Section 141 IPC. Therefore,
the Ld.Trial Court wrongly convicted the appellant for the offence of
rioting under Section 147 IPC read ... contended by the Ld.counsel for appellant that
appellant was wrongly convicted by the Ld.Trial Court for the offence
under Section 353 IPC read
below in placing reliance on the statement of
these two witnesses for convicting Raghunath Pandey for causing
death of Kanhaiya Pandey.
It is submitted ... Section 149 for
causing death of Kanhaiya Pandey. Further they are wrongly
convicted under Section 307 for causing injury to the villagers
and their further
