concerned person. In
the meanwhile, if any person has been given promotion temporarily, the same
need not be disturbed. Needless to mention that once ... necessary, by reverting the persons who were wrongly given promotion
temporarily. The said exercise shall be done within a period of three months
from
University to act upon the instruction of UGC for
the wrong promotion given to the petitioners and others. Accordingly, the
matter was placed before Syndicate ... resolved to withdraw the
Syndicate resolution dated 26.06.2009 giving promotion to the
petitioners and others treating the respective posts as academic non
vacation by following
above impugned proceedings as to why the promotion given to the petitioner was
wrong. The petitioner submitted that the said impugned order was passed based ... Court while observing that promotions were wrongly given contrary to
service jurisprudence and employees were wrongly given promotion just on
completion of 5 years
date of the
Government Order, he cannot now claim retrospective promotion.
6. I have given careful consideration to the submissions made by the
respective counsels ... affidavit
filed by them only indicates that in view of the wrong promotion given to the
erstwhile Watchman, the petitioner's appointment
passed the requisite examination and due verification
the concerned respondent has given the promotion to the
petitioner and as per the request of the petitioner ... requisite qualification that without passing the requisite
examination the petitioner has wrongly given promotion and it
is fact that of non passing of departmental examination
pension, gratuity and provident fund etc. on account of wrong promotion
given to him (Annexure-P/13).
The facts of the case, in short ... withhold 20% of his pension as he was wrongly given the
benefit of promotion and excess payment was made. Hence, this petition
is filed
much has been lost to the Government exchequer due to this wrong
promotion given to Shri Jai Prakash ANS against the rules and how will ... Government exchequer be compensated?
3. Which officers were held accountable for wrong promotion given to Shri Jai
Prakash and loss to the exchequer?
The CPIO
2012
Kendriya Vidhyalaya Sangathan (Appointment, Promotion and Seniority
etc.) Rules and the amendment was taken place vide office memorandum
dated 02.07.2010 (Annexure ... 2012
Rules and it was decided to withdraw the wrong promotion given to the
applicant.
5.1 The amendment in the Recruitment Rules as per Annexure
from the
learned C.P.O. it appears that the promotion was wrongly given to
nearly 112 Civil Engineering Assistants to the post of Junior ... Engineer. The said promotion as per the order of the Tribunal was
given as a deviation of the rules. Hence, it is obligatory
case. The present case is also not
a case of wrongly given notional promotion to juniors
(B.P Gairola decision of the Principal Bench
