partly allowed. In place of the
direction given by the learned Single Judge to give notional
promotion to the writ petitioner, we direct that ... directly recruited
as Hindi Translator, was wrongly given promotion as
Accountant [O‐(4)]; he stands reverted and he is holding the
post of Hindi Translator
same time, though it is stated that the petitioners were given wrong promotion to the post of Sub Inspector of Police in the year ... petitioners and the promotion given to the petitioners by way of accelerated promotion would definitely affect their promotion. Therefore, he would submit that the case
given. On the basis of the ST
certificate of Nayinda community under reservation
quota committee has further ordered that wrongly given
promotion under reservation quota ... considered. Under the
circumstances, the promotion given to Accused to the
post reserved for ST community has given wrongly and
it has to be withdrawn
promotion to
the post of SI w.e.f. 29.11.2000 vide order dated
31.12.2003. He got the said promotion wrongly as there
were 122 persons ... Supreme Court's judgements wherein it has been held that
wrong promotion given to a person can be withdrawn at
any time
4200/-. Hence, the contention of the respondents that he was wrongly given the Grade Pay of Rs.4200/- and this mistake was rectified by them ... 4200/- and as per the respondents contention that the applicant was wrongly given promotion and Grade Pay of Rs.4200/- and after realizing their mistake
fault. It
was a time-bound promotion which was given to him and some
eleven years thereafter, the authorities of the Bihar ... Government woke up and according to them the time-bound
promotion was wrongly given and that the relevant rules are
being relied upon and that
Time Bound Promotion. Stand of the State is that
benefit of the 2nd Time Bound Promotion was wrongly given. It is
pointed out that while
petitioner on the ground that he was wrongly given the Time Bound
Promotion from 1983, as he has not passed the Hindi Noting and
Drafting ... retiral dues of the petitioner, as he was
wrongly given the Time Bound Promotion from 1983 on account of
the fact that
Clerk was wrongly given. In fact, it was not a promotional post and
only 20/- extra was to be given. The said promotion ... authority.
I am of the view that the promotion/scale of Sub Division Clerk
was wrongly given to the petitioner, was not a promotion, therefore
bring into force in 03.02.2000. The applicant had been given a wrong promotion on 06.10.2000. Therefore without any doubt the promotion had been granted
