first
respondent, dated 25.08.2006 on the ground that the petitioners were wrongly
given promotion as Junior Assistant on par with M.Tajudeen and therefore ... after having given
promotion wrongly to M.Tajudeen, without giving promotion to the petitioners,
who are seniors to him, after giving promotion, the first respondent
concerned person. In
the meanwhile, if any person has been given promotion temporarily, the same
need not be disturbed. Needless to mention that once ... necessary, by reverting the persons who were wrongly given promotion
temporarily. The said exercise shall be done within a period of three months
from
University to act upon the instruction of UGC for
the wrong promotion given to the petitioners and others. Accordingly, the
matter was placed before Syndicate ... resolved to withdraw the
Syndicate resolution dated 26.06.2009 giving promotion to the
petitioners and others treating the respective posts as academic non
vacation by following
take strict action to refix the pay and reverse
the wrong promotion/increment given as pointed out in the earlier audit report.
7. The above ... observations
of the Local Fund Audit that the Universities had given wrong promotion and
24/ 34
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
concerned
person. In the meanwhile, if any person has been
given promotion temporarily, the same need not be
disturbed. Needless to mention that once ... persons and if necessary, by reverting
the persons who were wrongly given promotion
temporarily. The said exercise shall be done within a
period of three
above impugned proceedings as to why the promotion given to the petitioner was
wrong. The petitioner submitted that the said impugned order was passed based ... Court while observing that promotions were wrongly given contrary to
service jurisprudence and employees were wrongly given promotion just on
completion of 5 years
have announced one stage accelerated
promotion. But the petitioners were wrongly given double
promotion. Therefore, it is not open to the petitioners to
contend that ... Havildar in the
year 2004. Subsequently, after noticing that they were
given wrong promotion, that too, after a period of five
years, the first respondent
promotion panel year 2012-13. Therefore,
promotion ought not to have been given.
15. However, the fourth respondent would be eligible to get promotion ... judis
W.P.No.10716 of 2018
assuming that the promotion was wrongly given to the fourth respondent already
in the year 2012-13, seniority
have been given promotion either as
Supervisor or draftsman throughout the state.
14.In view of the said promotion given to 171 eligible
persons ... diploma certificate
issued by the State Government. They had been wrongly given
promotion as Supervisors. Therefore, the Government realised the
mistake and in order
promotion to Road Inspector Grade I. Further, mere
completion of five years as Road Inspector Grade II is not sufficient to get
promotion.
9. When ... merit and ability.
26. But promotions were given contrary to service
jurisprudence. Employees were wrongly given promotion
just on completion of five years of service
