7367/2012 Page 15 of 21
wrongly given promotion, the Petitioner cannot claim relief by introducing
the concept of negative equality. In this regard ... same illegality or
irregularity on ground of denial thereof to them. Similarly wrong judgment
passed in favour of one individual does not entitle others
benefit given to the said officer was wrong as the
same was applicable in case an officer is given an officiating promotion
under Rule ... before the Tribunal, it was not contended that they were wrongly
given the promotion. The Tribunal also relied on the fact that the
counsel
these circumstances, emphasized learned counsel, the
petitioner was beneficiary of only one promotion, contrary to the
CAT's findings. Learned counsel relied upon ... financial upgrdation merely on the ground that his juniors were
given a wrong promotion. Reliance was placed upon Point no. 8 of the
ACP scheme
scale of Rs.5,000-8,000/- did not amount to promotion or up
gradation but assignment of pay scale which ... financial upgrdation merely on the ground that his juniors were
given a wrong promotion. Reliance was placed upon Point no. 8 of the
ACP scheme
these circumstances, emphasized learned counsel, the
petitioner was beneficiary of only one promotion, contrary to the
CAT's findings. Learned counsel relied upon ... financial upgrdation merely on the ground that his juniors were given
a wrong promotion. Reliance was placed upon Point no. 8 of the ACP
scheme
does not mean 'actual'....
************
************
The notional promotion was given to Krishnamoorti to right
the wrong that had been done ... juniors being promoted over their seniors. When the
seniors were given the promotion from the same date as their juniors,
there was a dispute regarding
post, and therefore,
was wrongly promoted in the first instance. The
respondent No. 4 also felt aggrieved by the promotion
given to the petitioner ... promotion to the post
of SREO w.e.f. 3rd September, 1974 is concerned,
merely because the petitioner was given the said
promotion earlier
Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson ... vs Competition Commission Of India And ... on 30 March, 2016
Author: Vibhu
leave
period cannot be excluded in reckoning the teaching
experience. The definition given in Rule 3(k) of the Rules 1979
is different from ... case is therefore
entirely distinguishable.
21. The notional promotion was given to Krishnamoorti to
right the wrong that had been done
only engaged
through back door without selection but were also given
promotion through back door by some of the officers of
the respondent ... been given
promotion as LDC. The action of the respondent is in
complete violation of and in disregard of the Recruitment
Rules. Wrong and illegal
