employee has only right of
consideration of promotion and even if wrongful promotion has
been given the State has every authority to refix the year ... State
Government does not want to revert the persons who have
wrongfully given promotion due to wrong calculation of vacancies
then in view of Rule
employee has only right of
consideration of promotion and even if wrongful promotion has
been given the State has every authority to refix the year ... State
Government does not want to revert the persons who have
wrongfully given promotion due to wrong calculation of vacancies
then in view of Rule
given Time Bound Promotion on 15.02.1990 with effect from 16.04.1981.
(v) The Second Time Bound Promotion was given ... conclusion that the increments given on the basis of the promotions wrongly given cannot be recovered, without canceling the promotion. It further held that when
given time bound promotion
and after 11 years the authorities woke up to
claim that the time bound promotion was wrongly
given, relying ... Government
woke up and according to them the time
bound promotion was wrongly given and
then the relevant rules are being relied
upon and that
concerned person. In
the meanwhile, if any person has been given promotion temporarily, the same
need not be disturbed. Needless to mention that once ... necessary, by reverting the persons who were wrongly given promotion
temporarily. The said exercise shall be done within a period of three months
from
University to act upon the instruction of UGC for
the wrong promotion given to the petitioners and others. Accordingly, the
matter was placed before Syndicate ... resolved to withdraw the
Syndicate resolution dated 26.06.2009 giving promotion to the
petitioners and others treating the respective posts as academic non
vacation by following
7367/2012 Page 15 of 21
wrongly given promotion, the Petitioner cannot claim relief by introducing
the concept of negative equality. In this regard ... same illegality or
irregularity on ground of denial thereof to them. Similarly wrong judgment
passed in favour of one individual does not entitle others
issued by DIOS. Another Teacher Shiv Poojan Singh, who was also given wrong promotion in L. T. Grade, was reverted to his post
Renusagar Power Company Ltd vs General Electric Company And Anr on 16 August, 1984
Equivalent
promoted to the post.
4. The appellant after unsuccessfully challenging the promotion granted
to respondent no.5 before the Bombay High Court has brought ... fulfil the requirement of educational
qualifications and he was wrongly given the promotion. The High Court
considered the submission and rejected it holding that respondent
