Sevuga Pandia Thevar, hereinafter called the Zamindar, was the Zamindar of the erstwhile Estate of Seithur, an impartible Estate, in Ramanathapuram District in the State ... Estate and it continued to be so in the hands of the Zamindar's father, Sundaradoss Thevar. In the year 1895, the said Sundaradoss
made to
Nattuvar, and realise the dues through the instrumentality
of the Zamindar. The policy was implemented by including
the shrotiem in the Tirumazhy zamindari ... transferring
the Government's ultimate reversionary rights to the
Zamindar. The result was that the shrotriem tenure in the
hands of the Nature continued
descendant of a Jagirdar.
Certain disputes between the Jagirdar and the
Zamindars in the district had been settled in 1837
by a compromise between ... this arrangement the
collections from the Jagir became payable by the
Zamindars direct to the Government and the Jagirdar
and his successors no longer remained
Estate under the Act, one Varaguna Rama Pandia Chinnathambiar was the zamindar or proprietor of the estate and, therefore, the principal landholder of the Estate ... appellants is that the claims of the personal creditors of the Zamindar got extinguished on his death, the debts not being enforceable under Section
Permanent Settlement Regulation 25 of 1802, which dealt with
the tenure of zamindars in their estates. This Regulation
was passed on July ... service, in money, or in kind, and
whether paid to rajahs, jageerdars, zamindars,
polygars, motahdars, shrotriemdars, inamdars
or Government Officers, such as tahsildars,
amildars, aumeens
Board of Revenue. The father of the respondent was a zamindar of several villages including villages Rahimnagar Grant and Moondasawaran and had mortgaged ... various orders and proceedings for reduction of the decretal amount under the Zamindars Debt Reduction Act. With effect from 1-7-1952 the proprietary rights
passed
on 26th January 1951 but the right of the Zamindars vested
in the State only with effect from 1st July 1952. Also both
State Government had applied for reopening of the objection
cases and the Zamindar had asked for certain documents to
prove that the State Government ... claim of
privilege was allowed by the Objection -Officer. The
Zamindar had thereupon filed the application to challenge
the claim of privilege
Iyer J., was held to be too
wide in Abubucker Lebbai v. Zamindar of Ettayapuram.(2)
Rajamannar C.J., who delivered judgment of the Court
zamindaris, and seeking to adjust the disturbance of rights of the zamindars over a period of several years. The simple question would be whether these ... applied for payment out of the interim payments, the sons of the zamindar relying upon section 50 (8) opposed the claim on the ground that
